search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
NEWS


Travel Weekly has teamed up with leading industry employment lawyer Ami Naru for a regular column offering answers to readers’ legal questions on employment/HR matters. Ami will cover the latest employment issues facing the industry and respond to questions and dilemmas posed by you. In this column, Ami answers a question about expected changes to zero-hour contracts.


We use zero-hour and casual contracts during busy periods, especially in the summer, and have heard about planned changes to


Ami Naru PARTNER, TRAVLAW


The law on zero- hour contracts is set to change – are you ready?


the law in this area. Will we still be able to use these contracts, and what should we be aware of?


A. There has been a lot of news about exploitative zero-hour contracts recently, and while it does not seem that they will be banned, employers should be aware that zero and low-hour contracts are going to become harder to rely on in their current form. On July 1, the government published its


roadmap for the implementation of the Employment Rights Bill. Under the Bill, which is expected to come into force in 2027, the government has proposed new rights for workers on zero-hour or casual contracts. The aim is to reduce insecurity


to soften the Bill (including changing the duty to a “right to request” guaranteed hours rather than an employer having a duty to offer guaranteed hours), but they currently lack government backing and are unlikely to pass. Final details will be confirmed through secondary legislation, but employers should prepare for stricter rules in this area. While the Bill has support and is expected to pass


LEGAL


around work and encourage more predictable working patterns. Currently, power and control lies very much with employers. If passed in its current form, the Bill will introduce a right for qualifying workers to be offered guaranteed hours after a certain period (likely 12 weeks). Workers will still be able to decline the offer


Q&A


of work if it does not suit, but where someone is regularly working a set pattern, employers may have to formalise that arrangement. There will also be new rights to reasonable notice of shifts and compensation where shifts are cancelled at short notice. A new route to bring tribunal claims for non-compliance will also be introduced. There may be exceptions; for example, where


the need for casual work is genuinely temporary. However, exceptions are expected to be narrow. Amendments have been proposed in Parliament


in its current form, details are still being finalised. The precise rules around what counts as a regular pattern, how much notice is considered reasonable and how compensation for cancelled shifts will work are all due to be set out in secondary legislation. We may also see further clarification around exceptions for short-term and seasonal roles. Employers should monitor developments closely and be ready to adapt once the final regulations are published. Many businesses in the travel and


tourism industry rely on casual and seasonal staffing, whether for resort workers, customer service teams or airport operations. These changes could significantly increase admin, costs and legal risk where casual workers are


engaged for longer periods or on a regular basis. While the contracts themselves won’t be unlawful, their use will need to be more carefully managed. Employers in the travel industry should start reviewing their workforce requirements now and consider tracking working patterns to ensure they can identify when a guaranteed hours offer might be triggered. It’s also worth reviewing any internal policies


or manager guidance around shift allocation and cancellations, as well as contracts currently in use. With time to plan, businesses can continue to use flexible staffing models, but


the current approach will need to evolve. Q This article is not a substitute for formal legal advice.


Ami Naru is partner and head of employment at leading travel law firm Travlaw Legal Services and has advised the


industry on employment law for 25 years. Since qualifying as a solicitor in 2000, she has focused on building a practice dedicated to serving the industry and works with bodies including Abta, Aito and the Business Travel Association.


Q ASK AMI A QUESTION: If you have any questions relating to employment law, or other areas of HR, that you would like to put to Ami, email robin.murray@travelweekly.co.uk with the subject: Question for Ami


18


2 OCTOBER 2025


travelweekly.co.uk


PICTURES: David Robertson; Shutterstock/Lokal Vektor


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60