search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Bishop, who drowned in the cove outside their home shortly before her wedding day in 1880, Jes- sica becomes convinced that Emily is an even greater threat than she first imagined. While the film retains a number of elements from the plot of Le Fanu’s novella, including a charming female vampire and an ancestral por- trait that provides a valuable clue to her identity, its fidelity to the source is most evident in its tone and underlying themes. JESSICA is not only a perfect example of the type of “quiet horror” that was Le Fanu’s forte, but is also far more success- ful than any other adaptation in portraying CARMILLA’s tense atmosphere of deception and betrayal. By ingeniously setting the film within the last gasps of the 1960s counter-culture, writer and director Hancock is not only able to provide a clever rationale for getting the vampire into the victims’ home, but is also able to generate true pathos as the hopes and values of the “love generation” are kicked to the ground one last time. As in the no- vella, the plot is never dependent on the stupidity of the victims, and it is precisely because they act in the spirit of charity that they become easy prey to a cunning predator who transforms their dream of communal living in a bucolic haven into a nightmare of violence and death.


In Hancock’s film, the “opening of the inner eye” that permits perception of the supernatural is equated—as it surely would be today—with


schizophrenia, and the authenticity of Lampert’s performance is startling, perfectly capturing not only the vulnerability of Jessica’s fragile mental state but also her strained efforts to retain her com- posure as she struggles to discern the real from the hallucinatory. Costello’s outstanding perfor- mance as Emily, a predator capable of commit- ting the most vicious acts while simultaneously reassuring her victim that nothing untoward is oc- curring, is simply the most faithful portrayal of Carmilla on film. Although the lesbian content of CARMILLA is largely absent, it does appear in the film’s subtext—as Emily’s female victims (both Jessica and the young mute girl played by Gretchen Corbett) seem destined for a different fate than the exsan- guinated male zombies that populate the town. The film is also notable for being the first ad-


aptation of CARMILLA set in the United States— although this would not have been the case had Robert Wise and Val Lewton realized their planned color film adaptation that would have transposed the story to colonial America—a setting that per- fectly mirrors the novella’s ambiance of geographi- cal isolation and gentility. A cult favorite that gained its reputation largely from repeated television airings, LET’S SCARE JESSICA TO DEATH de- serves rediscovery not only as a perfectly realized ghost story and a credible adaptation of CARMILLA, but as a eulogy for the 1960s on par with GIMME SHELTER (1970) and WITHNAIL AND I (1987).


LET’S SCARE JESSICA TO DEATH: “a credible adaptation of CARMILLA... [and] a eulogy for the 1960s.”


24


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84