search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
SITE PREPARATION


Navigating the world of wastewater


Sequencing Batch Reactor technology should be the way forward for wastewater management, says David Stagg of Graf UK


T


he world of wastewater treatment has become a dynamic, complex, and challenging one. Nutrient


neutrality that requires reductions in nitrates and phosphates, reducing aonia leels in euent and caron dosing are just some of the factors that self-builders need to be aware of. It is no longer simply a choice between that most basic of wastewater solutions – the cesspool, the ‘happy medium’ – the septic tank, or the ultimate – the wastewater treatment plant. Now there are choices for wastewater


treatment plants too – between conentional owactiated sludge systems and those employing advanced Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR) technology.


One of the main differences between these disparate systems is that SBR combines various processes during the treatment cycle in a single treatment zone in a chronological sequence wic rules out te need or a clarifier secondary chamber.


SBR systems operate in batch cycles which generally run two or four times every 24 hours to ensure the treatment process is identical every time. This produces igualit euent. raditional continuous ow sstes operate on a ‘what goes in, comes out,’ basis, so during periods of heavy loadinginow te euent traels through the system much more quickly, potentiall reducing te euent ualit. The technology that SBR uses was implemented decades ago for Scandinavia, where reducing and monitoring phosphate and nitrate levels is common practice. More than 5,000 wastewater treatment systems with this technology have already been installed throughout Europe to meet these challenging discharge constraints, achieving an independently tested . gl o pospate reoal wit dosing and . gl witout dosing or domestic systems up to 50 population. enitrification is used to reduce nitrates acieing . gl.


jul/aug 2024


The SBR process is a modern method for cleaning wastewater. Its operational eiilit and ecellent process control opportunities, combined with the need to meet the increasingly stringent environmental discharge standards, means it is becoming the system of choice for well-informed self-builders. Bespoke designs utilising advanced SBR technology are allowing these informed homemakers to meet requirements for decreasing discharge levels of phosphate, nitrate, and ammonia.


SBR technology can be utilised in


recycled and recyclable plastic tanks which are eco-friendly and designed for installation using (depending on the ground conditions granular ackfill which is not only more cost-effective than concrete but also quicker to install. The system is also cheaper for self-builders to run, with lower power consumption ro . kWd wic euates to approximately £50 per year, based on a cost of £0.25 per kW.


A SBR system is operated by air power generated  a lowercopressor which means there are no moving parts or electrical components inside the tank itself. This reduces maintenance and replacement costs and makes for a ealtier ore eficient operation. Depending on the objective, the system can control oxygen levels entering the treatment zone allowing nitrification and denitrification treatent processes, as well as varying the duration, frequency, and arrangement of the cycle phases. The plant can therefore easily be customised.


noter enefit o tis ore adanced system is it comes with underload detection as standard, which allows it to operate eficientl wit up to  underload  a enefit particularl or second homes which are often left unoccupied for long periods of time. If the system is likely to drop below te  underload tresold caron dosing makes up the shortfall, as well as enhancing the treatment performance, to ensure low-odour and even odourless treatment and extended times between tank emptying.


SBR technology also differs to conventional systems in that no growth bodies are necessary, as the SBR process does not require the plastic media which can clog and escape from the tank, polluting the environment. As an alternative to standard batch cycle timings, SBR systems can also be operated depending on te fill leel according to te inow.  te sstes “buffer” recognises that only a small amount of wastewater has entered, it can automatically switch to economy mode. The SBR process gives self-builders much greater control over the treatment process, which can be monitored and adjusted when needed. While it aoids te need or traditional tertiar secondary treatment (such as reed beds which may become less effective over time and during the colder winter months), advanced tertiary treatment stages, such as UV, chlorination, and specialist sand filtration processes are possible with the latest SBR technology. Whatever the treatment processes, it is essential the system is commissioned by trained specialists who should also be responsible for its maintenance and servicing. Some manufacturers offer this service for free, as well as extended warranties on the technology of their SBR systems when the purchaser takes up a service agreement with an accredited service provider.


David Stagg is technical product specialist for Graf UK


www.sbhonline.co.uk 31


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70