search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
24 THE CLIMATE CHALLENGE


Larger areas of wildlife habitat will increasingly feature on new housing developments like this Meadfl eet open space in Cheshire


Formal areas alongside wildfl owers such as this Meadfl eet development will be more typical with biodiversity net gain requirements


housing developments, with small and medium sied developers likely to be most affected.


A SOLUTION


hrough our discussions with developers, we’ve been able to highlight the pros and cons of different  solutions, both at a high level and in detail. or example, the purchase of adacent land for onsite offsetting might seem a straightforward solution, but it comes with challenges. hould it have public access and what implications does this bring in terms of increased maintenance costs lso, the effect of additional areas on baseline calculations must be considered. here is also the question of long-term funding of on and offsite solutions. e are involved in proects with a range of scenarios, including resident contribution and commuted sum solutions, or a mix of the two. Meadfl eet already applies many of the  principles on the  developments we manage across ngland and ales. e have the inhouse expertise to review detailed ecological assessments and calculations and provide feedback, and to undertake the monitoring and adaptive management techniques required to ensure habitat targets are met over the -year period.


LIFETIME MANAGEMENT


here are understandable concerns in the housebuilding market regarding the long-term responsibility of a -year covenant, and selecting the right management model to entrust with the new requirements.


here is a need for a lifetime management solution that can take


MINDSETS istorically, open spaces contained formal mown grass areas and ornamental shrub beds, but now we are seeing the addition of features such as wildfl ower meadows and wildlife-friendly u. hese require a different management approach to ensure they successfully


on the liability and complexity of the requirements involved. here are already many aspects of open space management that require specialist expertise including play areas, woodlands, and u. ith members of the public accessing open spaces, risks must be carefully managed. ith the addition of  and the crucial role the legislation will play in providing spaces for nature, it is vital that these areas are managed by experienced open space experts. elf-management may seem to offer more choice and input, but the reality is often complex systems resulting in higher charges, inactivity, and confusion. irectors are burdened with legal and administrative issues including enforcement action which could leave them liable. his casts doubt as to whether the resident management model can ensure the successful delivery of .  lifetime management model with in-house expertise to manage all aspects of open space features obectively and responsibly, over the long-term, is designed to ensure a developer’s legacy is protected and risks minimised. evelopers should look for long-standing organisations with a proven reputation for excellence and expertise and the in- house specialist knowledge required. his approach also helps reduce customer costs and provides clear lines of accountability.


achieve their intended purpose however this can lead to queries as to why areas have been left unmanaged,’ and suggestions that this should result in reduced costs to customers.


ducation and engagement are crucial to alter perceptions of what open spaces will look like. ver recent years we’ve been voluntarily improving our open spaces for biodiversity and engaging customers and communities in this ourney. ur wildlife-focused campaigns and partnerships with biodiversity charities have been important tools in achieving this.


emonstrating how biodiverse open spaces will enrich the local environment to prospective purchasers from the beginning of the customer ourney is key to the ongoing mindset towards open space delivery. xamples include information leafl ets to ensure early engagement, customer newsletters, and resources to fully engage with residents for the lifetime of the development.


FINAL THOUGHTS he benefi t that biodiversity net gain will have to the current climate and biodiversity crisis is exponential, and aligning the industry with the overnment’s  targets will more fi rmly place sustainability at the centre of future development.


hrough a collaborative solution-based approach and the positive promotion of the initiatives in proects, we can help create a future where customers seek to live in a biodiverse neighbourhood, and where developers are applauded for providing it.


David King is managing director of Meadfl eet


THE MARKETPLACE FOR THE PURCHASE OF OFFSITE UNITS GENERATED BY THIRD PARTY LANDOWNERS IS UNCLEAR, WITH NO FORMAL CENTRAL DATABASE EXISTING


WWW.HBDONLINE.CO.UK


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100