search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
30 BUILDING-IN RESILIENCE: REVISITING FLOOD MITIGATION FOR NEW DEVELOPMENTS INDUSTRY VIEWFINDER


Do you think future housing standards should require specifi c SuDS or stormwater management features?  Yes  No  Depends on Location


on emerging products and technologies for fl ood and surface water mitigation approaches. Participants were asked whether they stay up to date with advances in u-related products, including improved permeable paving systems, modular underground storage, smart rainwater harvesting technologies, and real-time fl ood monitoring systems. he inclusion of these uestions refl ects the increasing role of technological innovation in delivering smarter and more adaptive water management infrastructure. espondents were asked to assess their confi dence in the performance of various stormwater management systems, including permeable paving, blue and green roof systems, modular storage systems, swales, wetlands, non-return valves, and tree pits. ome of this confi dence or lack of it, could stem from a lack of experience, or received ideas, and potentially greater education will have a large role in tackling this. The established standard solutions of permeable paving and modular underground storage saw good fi gures  and  of respondents very confi dent, however blue and green roofs only garnered 7%, and even swales and wetlands only managed


20%. Clearly, there is more to do to educate the sector on their respective merits.


DESIGN & INSTALLATION CHALLENGES


Installation challenges remain a major barrier to widespread uptake of resilient drainage measures. The survey therefore investigated which systems respondents have installed in practice and what aspects they found most diffi cult. Common challenges include maintenance responsibilities, upfront capital costs, design integration, space constraints, and navigating planning approval processes. Unsurprisingly, upfront costs were out in front with 62%, but available space was a major blocker for many, with 52% choosing them, as well as planning approval (48%), maintenance requirements (45%), and integration of products into designs (39%). Participants were also asked how frequently they encounter a selection of perceived barriers such as lack of client interest, limited supplier availability, or confl icting planning requirements. Client interest was an issue, but ‘high capital costs were cited by , as well as insuffi cient long-term


PRODUCED IN ASSOCIATION WITH


WWW.HBDONLINE.CO.UK


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68