search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
12 COMMENT


Nicky Brock, partner at Carter Jonas


How planning could stop BNG being a blocker


Nicky Brock of Carter Jonas argues that a small procedural change to biodiversity net gain approvals could unlock faster delivery without compromising environmental outcomes.


T


STREAMLINING DOES NOT HAVE TO MEAN WEAKENING BIODIVERSITY NET GAIN


WWW.HBDONLINE.CO.UK


here is no question that the planning system requires more speed and more certainty – and much of what the


Government has put in place in the last year is on track to achieve this.


But while, on a macro level, planning reform is heading in the right direction, for those of us dealing with planning applications day-in, day-out, it’s the small procedural frictions that cause the biggest frustrations. The requirement for local planning authorities to approve pre-commencement conditions for biodiversity net gain (BNG) is perhaps one of the most important to unpick. BNG is doing exactly what it was designed to do: placing nature recovery at the heart of (almost) all development. The problem is how it is being sequenced. The current approach requires an extra post-consent approval step that can cause material delays. If government wants a simple win that supports both nature recovery and delivery, it should focus on streamlining


the pre-commencement mechanics of BNG.


HOW THE PROBLEM MANIFESTS ITSELF I recently gained planning consent for a mid-sied greenfi eld housing scheme in Oxfordshire. Planning consent was issued within three months. The BNG solution, which was offsite, was straightforward: the units were purchased and the certifi cate submitted, yet eight weeks after consent we were still waiting for the BNG approval outcome. The knock-on effect is delays to housing delivery, including affordable housing, and to wider economic activity.


Where a scheme has already secured offsite units, the local authority is not being asked to weigh up competing habitat proposals or negotiate a bespoke ecological strategy; the developer is presenting a package that is designed to be compliant. Yet the statutory framework still requires a formal approval period before the condition is discharged and commencement can take place lawfully.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68