search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
4 INDUSTRY NEWS


FROM THE EDITOR


James Parker


The long wake of the Building Safety Act recently saw Barratt edrow come through with fl ying colours in the upreme Court, establishing a possible precedent that developers wont have to pic up the bill for remedying buildings The landmar case against structural engineer  Corp part of ecom shows that developers can pass on this cost to subcontractors even if the wor was historical, and they commissioned the wor voluntarily


ON THE COVER


HOUSEBUILDER & DEVELOPER


JUNE/JULY 2025


arratt subsidiary D Trading including David ilson omes won in the upreme Court recently against structural engineer  n  arratt underwent a review of its high- rise buildings and structures in ondon, eicester and Croydon were found to have serious issues owever, the real issue for the industry going forward is that a seven-member judging panel found that URS was accountable for the cost of remedying these defective designs  despite these occurring before the newly tightened provisions of the 


hen the overnment, shoced by the renfell tragedy, ased developers to inspect and remedy defects on their high-rise buildings, arratts was one of the tier s who fully engaged in this process The structural engineers upreme Court case rested on the arcane idea that Barratts was liable as it was not under any legal obligation to remedy the defects, however judges threw it out, in the process clarifying the realities of the uilding afety cts etended  year limitation on liability t would not be a surprise to see a slew cases from developers pursuing designers and subcontractors for historic building safety failings, particularly as they are now in line for a Delayed omes enalty of  if they dont mae a start on permitted sites


Update your registration here: A SITE WORTH ITS SALT


Russell Homes took on the site of a former salt mine in Cheshire to deliver 103 new homes offering a high degree of rural amenity – but also award-winning sustainability credentials


HBD_0607_2025 Covers.indd 1


Brook View, Wincham Go to page 36


16/06/2025 12:20


t the same time, momentum is building for central overnment to bolster its avowed support of domestic retrofi t with more robust collateral The nergy ecurity and et ero Committee however recently issued a report on the current efforts, which attaced stop-start measures and short funding cycles, which have undermined confi dence of consumers, installers, and the wider supply chain t also villifi ed the overnment for lacing clarity on how it intends to support retrofi t beyond , when ey schemes are due to epire


The Committees long list of recommendations include a simpler set of schemes suitable for less affl uent homeowners, and more consumer education ne resonant one also echoed the call which is being made ever louder by the ederation of aster uilders, for licensing of retrofi t contractors owever, which of these will the overnment even loo seriously at, given the febrile mi of priorities and challenges its wrestling with


Looking to update or cancel your registration? Scan the QR code to visit our registration page. From here you can also register for our Digital Issues and Newsletters. Alternatively, please visit hbdonline.co.uk/subscribe


WWW.HBDONLINE.CO.UK


There is confi dence being shown by a couple of major players on the supply side, that not only the uture omes tandard will eventually see the light of day, but also that the retrofi t agenda is going to icstart a boom for insulation aint obain and nauf recently announced they are to open  factories maing mineral wool, in elton owbray and hotton respectively


James Parker


Managing Editor James Parker


Publisher Anthony Parker


Account Director Midge Myatt


Account Manager Steve Smith


Digital Marketing & PR Account Manager Suzanne Easter


Operations Director Shelley Collyer


Editorial Contributor Roseanne Field


Event Coordinator Amy Madigan


Studio Manager Mikey Pooley


Production Assistant Georgia Musson


Digital Production Coordinator Kimberley Musson


Feature Coordinator & Publisher’s Assistant Kim Neville


Finance Director Simon Reed


An Employee Owned Company


Cointronic House, Station Road, Heathfi eld, East Sussex TN21 8DF


Advertising & Administration 01435 863500 info@netmagmedia.co.uk


Press Releases editorial@netmagmedia.co.uk


Registration & Circulation Enquiries info@netmagmedia.co.uk


In association with:


T e manufacturer of the paper used within our publication is a Chain-of-Custody certifi ed supplier operating within environmental systems certifi ed to both ISO 14001 and EMAS in order to ensure sustainable production.


Subscription costs just £24 for 6 issues, including post and packing. Phone 01435 863500 for details. Individual copies of the publication are available at £5 each inc p & p.


All rights reserved.


No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, including photocopying, recording or stored in any information retrieval system without the express prior written consent of the publisher. Although every eff ort is made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of material published in Housebuilder & Developer, the publisher can accept no responsibility for the claims or opinions made by contributors, manufacturers or advertisers. Editorial contributors to this journal may have made a payment towards the reproduction costs of material used to illustrate their products.


Printed in England.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68