search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
BUILDING FABRIC 57


A THERMAL BRIDGE TOO FAR?


Following changes to Part L in 2021, carbon emissions in new builds have to be signifi cantly lowered. Simon Hill of Schöck says specifi ers need to be aware how greatly thermal bridges can aff ect insulation values


Hendon Waterside


localised area of the building envelope with signifi cantly higher thermal conductivity than surrounding areas is known as a thermal bridge. Typically occurring where a material with high thermal conductivity penetrates the insulation layer. antilevered balconies are critical examples, resulting in higher heat transfer through the building assembly and colder surface temperatures on the warm side. The main consequences will be non-compliance with Building egulations, higher energy consumption for heating, condensation and the formation of mould growth. The 2021 edition of Part L (which replaces L1A 2013) sets out the minimum thermal requirements for avoiding such issues. Thermal bridging must now be included in fabric heat loss calculations and the Standard Assessment Procedure calculation (now updated to SAP 10.2) includes the term HTB (heat loss due to thermal bridging). A further


A


concealed by subsequent work, an audit should be undertaken to confi rm the designed details have been constructed. hotographs should be taken to verify that the products used are those shown in the original design. If there are substitutions, the revised specifi cation should be re ected in the SA calculation and report in the Building Regulations England Part L compliance report (BREL report). This information needs to be signed off by the SAP assessor.


General tightening of U-values – requiring greater insulation requirements and the construction of better performing thermal break details – are also included in the revised art . Additionally, it encourages HTB assessment to be carried out through thermal calculation for a more realistic evaluation of existing thermal junctions. The default Y-value has been increased to 0.20 W/m2


change involves an onsite audit for new dwellings. It is now required that before different construction junctions are


update to discourage generic estimations – as this does not reveal the performance of thermal break junctions, including


WWW.HBDONLINE.CO.UK


.K in the new


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76