search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
28 COMMENT


so that we can build a picture of our members’ output. All this data, along with the annual House Builders’ Survey later in the year, help to build a picture of market conditions for SME housebuilders – a sector we know is not heading in the right direction, delivering only 10% of new homes compared to 40% just over 30 years ago.


The FMB is working hard to put forward a voice for our housebuilding members and is in regular contact with those responsible for housing at national and devolved government level. Given current government actions, such as the Housing Secretary Michael Gove calling in one major development for being too ‘generic’ for the area it was sited, they must start looking seriously at SMEs as part of the solution to the housing crisis. Small, local housebuilders excel in delivering high quality, diverse in design homes, far from the ‘cookie cutter’ type


of schemes that we have become all too used to across the UK.


PLANNING FEES


The future of planning fees is currently being considered by the Government, with a few ideas on how they’ll look recently consulted on, but one thing seems clear, they will likely be increasing. However, our members have made clear that they do not feel enough progress has been made in Local Planning Authorities regarding the speed of applications to justify a rise in costs.


There is a clear need for extra resourcing in planning teams and this is well understood by local housebuilders who are on the front lines of a creaking planning system. For many years FMB members were supportive of increases to planning fees and even championed it. But, given the poor state of the small house building market; the rise in costs


from new regulations; and increasingly strained relationships with local planning teams, they do not feel a rise in fees, taken out of the pockets of small house builders, is ustifi ed. The overnment must think carefully at the damage a rise in fees may in ict on small housebuilders, and produce a meaningful plan on what support it will provide to boost their output.


WHAT NEXT?


Housing is clearly ramping up the agenda, it’s rarely out of the headlines. The lack of action to build new homes is seemingly fi ltering down into public discourse, which can often be the most potent incentive for any government to act. A bold plan going into party conferences would be nice to see, or even an outline plan ahead of the election next year, but I don’t hold out much hope. We’ll have to wait and see.


SMALL, LOCAL HOUSEBUILDERS EXCEL IN DELIVERING HIGH QUALITY, DIVERSE IN DESIGN HOMES, FAR FROM THE ‘COOKIE CUTTER’ SCHEMES WWW.HBDONLINE.CO.UK


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76