30 COMMENT
Repayments have shot up and many mortgage deals have been pulled. It is getting to the stage where nearly everyone either has direct experience of housing affordability problems, or knows of a family member or friend who is in diffi culties.
According to the campaign group Generation Rent (GR), the average time it takes to save for a home deposit in England has climbed to almost 10 years underlining the growing unaffordability for fi rsttime buyers. ata issued by the Halifax building society earlier this year found the average deposit for those buying their fi rst home in was ust over , up on . In London GR claims the average time before someone is able to step on to the property ladder is 18.3 years. However, that is only if the individual lived in a fl atshare the whole time. f they were to rent on their own, they would need to save for 27 years, the researchers claimed. Ben Twomey, a director at Generation
Rent, said: “In much of the country the typical worker faces at least a decade living and saving in the private rented sector before they have a mortgage deposit. That gets close to two decades for Londoners, and even then, that’s only possible by sharing with other people into their 40s.”
So is it shortfalls in supply that are driving prices up and demand through the roof, or is it a political and economic downturn that is damaging builders’ confi dence levels and forcing them to cut back on their development plans? The Chancellor has tried to strong arm the banks and building societies into being more fl exible with their borrowers by extending loan terms (up to 35 or even 40 or 50 years), giving payment holidays and holding off from calling in the bailiffs. But the Treasury is not awash with cash and its reluctance to fi nance any specifi c offers of help, is severely limiting the pressure they can apply.
Not long before the Manchester (Housing) conference, the NHF published the results of a survey which shows the Conservative Party might have lost touch with their grassroot supporters and the wider electorate more generally. The poll results show the majority (52%) of Conservative voters in Britain believe we are not building enough social housing while around half (48%) think the Government should prioritise building
social housing over homes for sale (28%) or private rent (8%).
The results showed a strong consensus among Brits of all ages, political affi liations and across all parts of the country, over a need to build social housing above other types of homes. Over 50s, the demographic most likely to vote, were most in favour of prioritising social housing.
The survey also revealed the public’s view of the Government’s record on housing, with nearly twothirds of voters saying they thought housing issues in general had got worse since the last general election. When asked whether housing issues had got worse for specifi c groups, the highest number of voters (70%), said they had got worse for people on low incomes (less than £20,000). This was true for voters from all three main parties.
A LONG TERM PLAN FOR HOUSING The polling coincided with the NHF launching a new report, ‘Why we need a long term plan for housing’, which makes the case to all political parties for a strategic, long term plan aimed at drastically increasing the number of affordable and social homes built over the next decade.
It revealed that the Government has published national strategies on areas ranging from space (the National Space Strategy) to shipbuilding (the 30 Year National Shipbuilding Strategy) but it doesn’t currently have a national strategy for housing. Which brings us back to the mismatch between having the 300,000 new homes a year target, but withdrawing the need for local delivery plans and targets.
Kate Henderson, chief executive of the NHF said: “There is a clear consensus among voters from all parties and people across all ages and parts of the
country, not only that we need to build more social housing, but that this should take precedence over building any other types of home. There is also indisputable evidence that housing policies over the last few decades, particularly those focused on home ownership, have widened inequality, increased Government spending and made the housing crisis worse.” She added: “How can it be that we have a national strategy for space exploration, but no strategy for homes back here on earth? With such strong public support for and proof of the need for more social housing, it’s time for politicians to catch up and make meaningful commitments that will solve the housing crisis and ensure everyone has access to a safe, secure and affordable home. We urgently need a long term plan aimed at drastically increasing the number of affordable and crucially social homes built over the next decade.”
The private rented sector has been picking up much of the slack in the market, providing temporary homes for those who are waiting to get on to the property ladder. But even here, there is evidence that many ‘accidental’ landlords are taking fright at changes in regulation and the weaker economy by selling up some or all of their homes for let. Councils and housing associations are keen to pick up the slack and increase their housebuilding, but they are constrained by the lack of cash available to subsidise the cost of building. Their own resources are spread too thinly to deliver on all their priorities, with the Government and social housing regulator requiring them to undertake more decarbonisation work, improving energy effi ciency and tacle safety issues, like damp and mould in their existing stock. Social rents have also been capped, mainly in an effort to control the housing benefi t bill, but with the unplanned consequence of reducing landlords’ resources for building new homes. This all amounts to an extensive list of issues and problems for Ms McLean and her boss Michael Gove to correct. It’s unlikely that any changes made in the next few months will have a positive impact before the next general election. But it leaves us back with the original question which the Government has to address where will the much needed new housing come from?
COUNCILS AND HOUSING ASSOCIATIONS ARE KEEN TO PICK UP THE SLACK AND INCREASE THEIR HOUSEBUILDING RATE, BUT THEY ARE CONSTRAINED BY THE LACK OF CASH AVAILABLE TO SUBSIDISE THE COST OF BUILDING
WWW.HBDONLINE.CO.UK
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92
