search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
14


water testing facility in Europe – the FloodSAFE House concept is proving its inventors claims of being a practical solution to avoid damage to a property. Based on an adapted Hadley light gauge steel frame, the three-bedroom (although roofless replica detached home has been developed in partnership with Floodjack International, inventors of a mechanical steel jacking system purpose-designed for raising buildings in flood emergencies. Now a fully-functioning test prototype, the process will result in a Flood rotection Certificate before it sees a live test with occupants to see how it performs as a home. Part of what enables this model to be easily lifted by the Floodjack is that while a traditionally built three-bed house weighs between - tonnes adleys bric slip-clad model is currently down around the  tonne mark.


The system is driven by sensors in, around and beneath the building, which activate the jacks to steadily lift the lightweight structure – at the same speed as the flood waters rise  and lower it gently once they have subsided. According to the project team, it will “keep contents safe and dry at precisely the moment it is needed,” therefore reducing both damage to the fabric, and the time needed for people to return home following a flood.


“THERE IS NO SILVER BULLET FOR FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT,” SIMON GILLILAND, ASSOCIATE, WSP WWW.HBDONLINE.CO.UK


The Environment Agency-approved water sensors will trigger a control panel within  seconds of detecting a significant water-related event. The house taes  minutes to reach its full . metre height   floods are typically  mm according to consultant  who are working with Hadley and the University of Liverpool to develop the system. WSP has liaised with both the Environment Agency and insurers to “help


them understand how the house would work and what the implications would be for them.” They have also spoken to local authorities and housing associations about the ways in which the FloodSAFE House “could open up previously unsuitable sites for social housing development.”


The systems control panel sits unobtrusively beneath the ground floor and keeps the structure at its elevated level until “it is safe for the structure to return to ground level,” says Hadley. If any obstructions are detected, the jacks will automatically stop. As well as the steel frame, the house consists of offsite- constructed SIPS (structural insulated panels) modules, which are all shipped to site in a single day, and which offer sustainability benefits over traditional home construction, according to Hadley.


INDUSTRY PIONEERS en Towe group  at the adley Group, explained at the demonstration event why the steel frame company has jumped wholeheartedly into the initiative. Its partly a commercial imperative; the commensurate potential numbers of homes which could be created in previously unviable sites give it “opportunity to achieve scale in the housing market.”


Its not ust about what you build its how fast he says. ith the highly accurate, as well as rapid ‘Advanced ethods of Construction approach it is using to create offsite buildings, “we could steal a bit of a march against the rest of the world” with the FloodSAFE House, he believes. “Ultimately, the opportunity for us and developers is huge, because you can put more houses on the same site, which can make each site stack


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84