search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
GROUNDWORKS & DRAINAGE 53


A more modern way to manage wastewater


David Stagg from Graf UK explains why innovative sequencing technology is the way forward for efficient wastewater management in developments


N


utrient neutrality that requires reductions in nitrates and phosphates, reducing ammonia levels in the effluent and carbon dosing – the world of wastewater treatment has become a dynamic, complex, and challenging one.


No longer is it just a choice between cesspool, septic tank, or wastewater treatment plant. Now there are options for wastewater treatment plants too – between conventional flow/activated sludge systems and those that employ advanced sequencing batch reactor (SBR) technology. One of the main differences between these systems is that SBR combines several processes during the treatment cycle in a single treatment zone, in a chronological sequence which means a clarifier/secondary chamber is no longer required. SBR systems run in batch cycles which generally operate twice or four times every 24 hours to ensure the treatment process is identical every time to produce high-quality effluent.


Continuous flow systems operate on a “what goes in, comes out” basis, so during periods of heavy loading/inflow the effluent travels through the system much quicker, potentially reducing the effluent quality. The technology around SBR was implemented decades ago in Scandinavia, where reducing and monitoring phosphate and nitrate levels is common practice. More than 5,000 wastewater treatment systems with this technology have already been supplied throughout Europe to meet these challenging discharge constraints, achieving an independently tested 0.4 mg/l of phosphate removal with dosing and 1.6 mg/l without dosing for domestic systems up to 50 populations. Denitrification is used to reduce nitrates, achieving 7.9 mg/l. Larger population requirements would be designed individually.


ADF MARCH 2024


The system of choice The SBR process is a modern method for cleaning wastewater. Due to its many advantages – its operational flexibility and excellent process control possibilities – combined with the need to meet the increasingly stringent environmental discharge standards, it is becoming the system of choice for UK designers/specifiers and consultants.


Bespoke designs utilising advanced SBR technology are allowing these influencers to meet requirements for decreasing discharge levels of phosphate, nitrate, ammonia, biological oxygen demand (BOD) and suspended solids (SS). They also bring potential design solutions for more challenging applications such as breweries, distilleries, dog kennels, dairies, and chicken farms.


SBR technology can be employed in recycled and recyclable plastic or precast


WWW.ARCHITECTSDATAFILE.CO.UK


The many advantages of the sequencing batch reactor (SBR) process for cleaning wastewater mean it is becoming the system of choice for UK designers and specifiers


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84