search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
4


NEWS


Managing Editor James Parker


Publisher Anthony Parker


Account Director Midge Myatt


Senior Account Manager Steve Smith


Digital Marketing & PR Account Manager Suzanne Easter


Operations Director Shelley Collyer


Editorial Contributor Roseanne Field


Events Coordinator Amy Madigan


Studio Manager Mikey Pooley


Production Assistant Georgia Musson


Digital Production Coordinator Kimberley Musson


Feature Coordinator & Publisher’s Assistant Kim Neville


Finance Director Simon Reed


Advertising & Administration 01435 863500


info@netmagmedia.co.uk Press Releases


editorial@netmagmedia.co.uk Registration &


Circulation Enquiries info@netmagmedia.co.uk


FROM THE EDITOR


I


t’s refreshing to see a non-‘starchitect’ winner of the Pritzker Architecture Prize, the accomplished but unshowy Liu Jiakun of China being this year’s recipient. Looking at his buildings, reputed to “celebrate the everyday lives of people,” they embody strong materiality, but also a certain modesty, especially given the “freedom from any aesthetic constraint” that the Pritzker jury claim his work demonstrates.


Sometimes sculptural, Jiakun’s buildings also offer a variety of carefully considered responses to their context, lacking an overbearing ‘signature’ in favour of a softer, more permeable character. He describes this as the result of an aspiration to “be like water – permeate through a place without carrying a fi xed form of my own and to seep into the site itself.” And his re-making bricks from straw and rubble left after the 2008 Chengdu earthquake was a brilliant bit of reuse that’s been rightly celebrated.


Liu is the 54th ‘laureate’ of the Prize, considered the most signifi cant in international architecture. He was chosen, said the judges, in recognition of how he has “placed people and communities at the forefront throughout his four-decade career.” He’s only the third Chinese architect to have won the prize, (one of the other was Chinese-American – IM Pei, the other Wang Shu who founded Amateur Architecture Studio).


An Employee Owned Company


Cointronic House Station Road, Heathfi eld East Sussex, TN21 8DF


With a similarly sized pool of architects, the UK has done slightly better over the years, with fi ve big names winning (Stirling, Foster, Hadid, Rodgers and Chipperfi eld). The UK’s long tradition of international achievement might have led you to expect a couple more awards to be distributed outside of these household names. But US architects have only won the prize seven times, and produced no winner since 2005. This only reinforces the credibility of the competition, at least in terms of its country-diversity and global perspective, and possibly also refl ects a change in focus away from prestige projects to something more ‘holistic.’


The criteria for such international prizes are probably even more arcane and elusive than other national prizes. However, they always succeed in focusing attention toward the impressive results of committed individuals, and help us to realise the signifi cant recent of the profession over recent decades.


Annual subscription costs just £48 for 12 issues, including post and packing. Phone 01435 863500 for details. Individual copies of the publication are available at £5 each inc p & p. All rights reserved


No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, including photocopying, recording or stored in any information retrieval system without the express prior written consent of the publisher. Although every effort is made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of material published in Architects Datafi le, the publisher can accept no responsibility for the claims or opinions made by contributors, manufacturers or advertisers. Editorial contributors to this journal may have made a payment towards the reproduction costs of material used to illustrate their products. The manufacturer of the paper used within our publication is a Chain-of-Custody certifi ed supplier operating within environmental systems certifi ed to both ISO 14001 and EMAS in order to ensure sustainable production. Printed in England


This magazine may be recycled


Put into relief by International Women’s Day recently, the lack of female representation in the Pulitzer Prize is stark, but it’s also a sign of how the profession still fi nds it troublingly diffi cult to allow female designers to rise to the top. It took 25 years for the prize to be awarded to a woman, the late Zaha Hadid. And only fi ve women have won since, two of whom (Yvonne Farrell and Shelley McNamara) had to share the prize in 2020, as they were deemed ‘equal counterparts’ at Grafton Architects. There is still a lot to do.


James Parker, Editor


Looking to update or cancel your ADF registration? Scan the QR code to visit our registration page. From here you can also register for our Digital


Issues and Newsletters. Alternatively, please visit architectsdatafi le.co.uk/subscribe


ACKLAM ROAD, KENSINGTON HNW Architects created a sensitive and carefully detailed housing project in the shadow of Grenfell


ADF03_2025 Covers.indd 1 10/03/2025 10:57 03.25 ON THE COVER...


Acklam Road – a richly detailed and rigorously designed scheme by PRP; delivered by HNW Architects


Update your registration here:


Cover image © Peter Langdown For the full report on this project, go to page 22


WWW.ARCHITECTSDATAFILE.CO.UK


ADF MARCH 2025


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60