GROUNDWORKS & DRAINAGE 45 Architects needed, now!
Wastewater treatment specialists Graf UK are calling on architects to help improve ground water quality throughout the UK; the firm’s David Stagg explains why it’s critical for designers to get involved
A
sking architects to become more involved in wastewater treatment is a big deal. They might not want to get their hands dirty; however they are major influencers when it comes to the two factors that are driving this increasingly contentious issue.
One is that Natural England is increasingly “advising” local authorities to halt the determination of planning applications unless the developments can prove they will be nutrient (nitrogen and phosphate) neutral. High levels of these nutrients, which come partly from wastewater treatment discharges, cause excessive growth of green algae – which smothers rare habitats and wildlife. The other is an update to the General Binding Rules of January 2020. This is a bid by the Environment Agency to reduce the level of sewage pollution in the nation’s watercourses, so is particularly relevant to architects designing properties off the mains sewage network. Under the new rules, anyone with a septic tank discharging into a watercourse must replace it, or upgrade the foul water solution.
These rules do not apply in Scotland – here the regulations governing foul water management are much more stringent. SEPA (the Scottish Environment Protection Agency) requires wastewater treatment systems for up to 15 people to be registered on a public database so they know what system a property is running, and where the effluent discharges to. A system catering for more than 15 people requires a licence and must meet a quality standard determined by SEPA so this can dictate the type of system installed. Here, again, is an area where architects have an influence.
While architects are required to specify solutions for foul water drainage and disposal to Building Regulations Approved Document H, until such time as there is a national governing body for wastewater treatment monitoring, the Environment Agency, SEPA and NRW (Natural Resources Wales) are the individual organisations setting effluent quality
ADF MARCH 2022
Architects might not want to get their hands dirty; but they are major influencers
standards. These governing bodies have hundreds of regional offices which generally operate independently, so are not set up to monitor this situation. In addition, approval for a sewage treatment plant is usually via a local authority’s building control department, which could be the most obvious body to take on the registration and monitor of such plants. But as all local authorities operate independently and already have large workloads, that’s an unlikely solution. So, without Government legislation it would be very difficult to implement a national scheme to deal with this issue, and even then, it would be difficult to implement and monitor. Which is where architects come in.
Architects’ roles in specifying quality
As well as specifying a sewage treatment system that is appropriate for the level and regularity of use and the ground conditions, architects need to ensure it is installed, commissioned and maintained properly to avoid effluent issues down the line. This isn’t a decision anyone wants to get wrong! Septic tanks do not require regular servicing, but should be monitored and emptied regularly. Sewage treatment plants, which involve mechanical parts, are more complex. These must be emptied at the right time (too late or too early can affect effluent quality), which only a competent contractor can advise on and carry out to avoid damaging the internal workings. There are literally hundreds of thousands of septic tanks and wastewater treatment systems in the UK and unfortunately a high percentage of them are not ‘MOT’d’ correctly. Then you have the rapidly increasing number of new systems being installed – potentially adding to the
WWW.ARCHITECTSDATAFILE.CO.UK
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84
