search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
4


NEWS


Managing Editor James Parker


jparker@netmagmedia.co.uk Publisher


Anthony Parker aparker@netmagmedia.co.uk


Content & Research Coordinator Shelley Collyer


Editorial Contributor Jayne Dowle


Events Coordinator & Data Analysis Amy Madigan


Studio Manager Mikey Pooley


Production Assistants Georgia Musson Kim Musson


Account Manager Steve Smith


Digital Marketing & PR Account Manager Suzanne Easter


Publishing Assistant Kim Neville


Managing Director Simon Reed


Advertising & Administration t 01435 863500 info@netmagmedia.co.uk www.architectsdatafi le.co.uk


Press Releases


editorial@netmagmedia.co.uk Registration &


Circulation Enquiries info@netmagmedia.co.uk


yout 1 17/03/2013 13:19 Page 1


netMAGmedia Ltd Cointronic House Station Road, Heathfi eld East Sussex, TN21 8DF


netMAG media


publ i shing – ver t i cal search


There was also a signifi cant amount of extra guidance on the acoustics aspects (and limitations) of designing ‘open plan’ teaching spaces, including speech intelligibility, a major factor in modern schools. There were detailed guidance for achieving the acoustic standards in refurbished buildings, and new noise limits for non- education activities in schools, and calculation methodologies for reverberation control in sports halls, swimming pools, gyms, and dance studios.


BB93 is ‘mandatory’ meaning that all spaces in any school have to be designed with the “acoustic conditions and the insulation against disturbance by noise appropriate to its intended use.” However, is that too woolly in terms of the overall status of the guidance? Reportedly, many specifi ers only refer to the minimum standards set out in section 1 of the document, and don’t follow all of the guidance.


Annual subscription costs just £48 for 12 issues, including post and packing. Phone 01435 863500 for details. Individual copies of the publication are available at £5 each inc p & p. All rights reserved


No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, including photocopying, recording or stored in any information retrieval system without the express prior written consent of the publisher. Although every effort is made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of material published in Architects Datafi le, the publisher can accept no responsibility for the claims or opinions made by contributors, manufacturers or advertisers. Editorial contributors to this journal may have made a payment towards the reproduction costs of material used to illustrate their products. The manufacturer of the paper used within our publication is a Chain-of-Custody certifi ed supplier operating within environmental systems certifi ed to both ISO 14001 and EMAS in order to ensure sustainable production. Printed in England


This magazine may be recycled


Can a fully healthy and effi cient school building be created if BB93 is not followed to the letter, at least where the guidance clear? If that is done, will it be within all of the current cost parameters, or will it require a very diffi cult conversation with education clients?


James Parker, Editor I


FROM THE EDITOR


’d argue that getting acoustics right in schools remains not only one of the most important aspects for both pupils’ learning and teachers’ wellbeing, but one of the most underappreciated. In this supplement devoted to design for education and healthcare facilities (which share a good amount of environmental factors for successful design), Michael Anderson of acoustic ceilings fi rm Zentia describes why the offi cial guidance Building Bulletin 93 needs to be the starting point for designers.


BB93 (updated in 2015) states its objective as “design and construction of school buildings that provide acoustic conditions that enable effective teaching and learning.” The acoustic criteria set out in the guidance relates to noise intrusion from external sources, insulation requirements between rooms, and controlling reverberation times within rooms, as well as additional requirements for pupils with hearing issues.


The 2015 update included the impact of natural ventilation strategies, and guidance on the control of equipment noise in teaching and learning spaces. It also included examples of construction details for sound insulation, new guidance on curtain walling and clarifi cation of acoustics requirements between circulation areas, classrooms and non-teaching rooms.


Looking to update or cancel your ADF registration? Scan the QR code to visit our registration page. From here you can also register for our Digital


Issues and Newsletters. Alternatively, please visit architectsdatafi le.co.uk/subscribe


ADF_05_2024 Healthcare & Education Supp Covers.indd 1 09/05/2024 11:39


DESIGN FOR HEALTHCARE & EDUCATION


05.24


adf


ON THE COVER...


FCBStudios honoured the proud history of Rotherhithe Primary school and celebrates the life, energy and positivity that makes it a forward- thinking educational establishment, and community hub.


For the full report on this project, go to page 14


WWW.ARCHITECTSDATAFILE.CO.UK


ADF MAY 2024


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36