search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
REGULATION Brexit- what next? David Wright, UKLA Director General


Ten weeks away from the date of the UK’s exit from the European Union (EU), UK Members of Parliament voted down the terms of exit agreed with the European leaders.


Those in favour of Brexit were concerned the Northern Ireland backstop might lock them into EU regulations in future. Those in favour of remaining were concerned the negotiated agreement did not go far enough by excluding a customs union and access to the EU single market.


So for different reasons 432 members of Parliament voted down the deal, a majority of 230 which was the biggest voting majority against a sitting UK government in history.


Donald Tusk, EU Council President, raised the notion of the UK remaining in the EU in the absence of any agreement. Some in the UK government believed the vote in Parliament gave Prime Minister (PM) May a strong mandate for renegotiating the deal. The concern was that with such a large majority against the existing deal, the chasm to bridge would be too wide to reach an agreement which would be acceptable to both sides.


More telling was PM May ruling out an exit on a ‘no deal’ basis which has been written into the UK statute books as the default option in the absence of a deal. With 40 ‘sitting days’ left before the end of March for the UK Government to pass 80-100 pieces of secondary legislation and four major Acts, time is running out as EU Commission President Junckers acknowledged.


Talk around the House of Parliament, following a no confidence motion tabled by the opposition which PM May looks certain to win, is of a general election if the motion is carried or a move towards a second referendum if it is lost.


The question on the referendum to the British people would be to ask them whether they would accept the existing negotiated deal, in the absence of Parliament’s agreement, or whether they wished to remain in the European Union.


Talk of extending the notice period under Article 50 of the Lisbon treaty would mean more time to negotiate although with European elections due in July 2019, which the UK would not wish to field candidates or face a legal challenge, an extension of only a few months is possible. Any extension would require the approval of all other 27 EU member states. On the other hand the UK could withdraw notice under Article 50 without the agreement of the other EU member states at any time.


PM May has said publicly that she feels a duty to deliver the referendum result of Brexit for the British people. She does face a Conservative party split between those who wish to leave and those who wish to remain, as is the case with the opposition Labour party led by eurosceptic Jeremy Corbyn.


If the negotiated agreement was a compromise which failed to satisfy a majority of UK Members of Parliament then it is difficult to see any subsequent negotiation being passed without a second referral to the British people.


62


46


LUBE MAGAZINE NO.148 DECEMBER 2018 LUBE MAGAZINE NO.149 FEBRUARY 2019


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56