search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
property. New additions include a product categorisation code, a system for statistical analysis yet to be defined by the commission and the requirement to declare the types and size of the packaging if a consumer or professional product is placed on the market.


This partial standardisation aims to make registration easier for companies operating across several Member States. However, there is still scope for wide variation in the information required, as individual countries may request information beyond the EC’s minimum level. Therefore understanding the specific requirements for each target market will remain a priority for companies when the new regulations come in.


Clarification on resubmission for mixtures There is now clarification on the changes that can be made to the concentration of components within products before resubmission is required. This allows manufacturers greater flexibility in their products design, without incurring resubmission costs. However, there are a number of complexities and caveats within this proposal. Member States still have the option to choose to accept a supplied concentration range or require an exact concentration. The accepted range may vary between hazardous components and non-hazardous components, and substances deemed to be a major concern for emergency health response, such as serious eye damage category one. This two-tier system may result in continuing variations in requirements between Member States.


Changes required to packaging information A Unique Formulation Index (UFI) will be required on all packaging to make product identification quicker and easier once it is registered with the poison centre. UFIs will be managed by the Commission, which will bear the cost of allocating and maintaining a database. However, the cost for altering packaging to show these codes will be on the organisation that places the product on the market, potentially adding an additional overhead to manufactures and distributors.


Protecting intellectual property In a move to protect intellectual property, it will be permissible to use generic terms for components of mixtures - assuming they are not classified as hazardous by their physical or health effects - and are no more than 10% of the mixture. These include terms such as ‘fragrances’ or ‘colouring agents’, and are accepted assuming compliance with the stipulations in Article 24 of CLP: proving that an International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) name would commercially harm the business, particularly its intellectual property.


Changes to scope


The consultation found that calls relating to industrial products are a small percentage of those received by poison centres. As such, a limited information requirement has been proposed for submission of industrial products to a poison centre (i.e. products that are intended to be used solely on an industrial site). This submission requires the inclusion of product composition already specified in the SDS, but to be eligible a 24 hour telephone number must be supplied which can provide detailed additional product information in the case of an emergency. This has the potential to greatly reduce the volume and cost of submissions a business may need to undertake. However, organisations will need to ensure they their systems are robust enough to deliver round the clock expert advice when required.


Removal of the 30 day ‘grace period’ All products, regardless of submission dates, must be registered


before being placed on the market. This seems to counter the 30 day grace period countries have in place for registration after a product is placed on the market. This will require companies to have full knowledge of the legislation in their intended market and to factor in achieving compliance within their timescales.


Changes to submission format There is a wide range of submission formats used across Member States, requiring submissions in several formats and adding additional cost to industry. The draft proposes to harmonise submission in XML format, which will be supplied by the European Commission. Additionally, it will be possible for a single submission to be made for a group of similar mixtures that have the same hazards, and whose constituents fall within the same concentration levels. This is anticipated to significantly reduce the volume of individual submissions and the burden to industry, particularly for products of a very similar nature that have a variety of trade names within a single market.


Reducing the cost of compliance These new requirements are being implemented step wise to reduce the effects on industry and will be implemented depending on the intended use of the mixture. These new amends are applicable to importers and downstream users from: • 2019 for consumer products (destined for use by consumers).


• 2020 for professional products (destined for professional users but not used at industrial sites).


• 2023 for industrial products (used at industrial sites only).


It has also been proposed that submissions provided before these amendments come into force will remain valid until the 1st January 2025 unless there has been a significant change in formulation, product identifier or classification of the mixture.


If ratified, the Commission’s amendments to CLP will dramatically change the requirements for companies’ product submissions to Member State poison centres. The changes will have the potential to accelerate submissions while reducing the cost of poison centre compliance; however they also increase the enforcement of the legislation, and present a higher risk of fines or product removal for non-compliant companies. As always, a comprehensive understanding of how best to meet corporate responsibility will be key to maintaining business continuity and securing commercial success.


It is important to appreciate that the current amendments found on the Commission’s website are only a draft and subject to change. After the consultation stage, the NCEC will provide more information on ratified changes to help chemical companies maintain compliance and secure the greatest value from the new regulatory landscape.


For more information on how to comply with current regulations in every region in Europe download NCEC’s poison centre compliance resource pack at http://the-ncec.com/ Poison-centre-information-pack or contact Larissa Silver at larissa.silver@ricardo.com.


LINK www.ricardo.com


LUBE MAGAZINE NO.136 DECEMBER 2016


53


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69