On the agenda University Presses

Seventh university presses convention seeks to build on sector’s broad appeal

Occupying a unique place in the publishing ecosystem, many university presses are achieving crossover hits. But balancing that with their bread and butter can be a challenge

Tom Tivnan @tomtivnan T

here are 104 universit presses exhibiting at Frankfurt Book Fair 2019, from behemoths Oxford Universit Press and Cambridge Universit, to more boutique lists such as Estonia’s Tallinn Universit Press and Spain’s Vigo Universit Press. But whatever the size of the balance sheets, collectively these businesses inhabit a unique part of the publishing world: they must be every bit as forward-thinking and financially viable as their commercial rivals, while adhering to the values of the institutions they are part of. That they occupy a very particular part of publishing is a reason behind the formation of the International Convention of Universit Presses, now in its seventh year (see right). An entit which is emblematic of the bulk of many in the sector is perhaps Princeton Universit Press (PUP). It has similarities to the big boys such as OUP and CUP in that it is linked to a prestigious universit, but operates at a smaller scale, releasing around 250 titles a year, compared to thousands for the Oxbridge presses.

PUP’s list, weighted toward the humanities and social sciences, does lend itself to trade crossover, and the fact that the press does not produce journals means it has a relatively low digital footprint—between 20% and 25% of revenue derives from digital products in a particular year. Caro says: “Commercial academic publishers are oſten pursuing content and they don’t really differentiate between the tpe of content—whether journals, chapters or whole books. They are aggregating content and selling in packages in bundles. We are very much still into old fashioned books, even though our books are in some of those aggregators.” The biggest issue for over a decade across academic publishing has, of course, been Open Access. Princeton Universit itself has a rather robust pro-OA policy, and Caro is at pains to make the separation between PUP and its institution. She says: “What a lot of the arguments around OA do not take into account is the role of curation and dissemination that we have. It is all very well people in the academy doing research, but if no one gets to read it, or never gets to see it in a synthesised way that makes it more accessible in how it relates to readers’ own worlds, then it is not as effective.”

Seven Up

The seventh International Convention of University Presses will be held tomorrow (19th October), with a focus on accessibility—how presses can better serve those who for various reasons need aid or a replacement in the traditional reading process. A key part of this is the “born accessible” movement: that titles should not be converted into accessible formats after publication, but created from inception with these alternative formats in mind. The accessibility issue

We are between the

Routledges and the Palgrave

Sarah Caro, PUP’s global editorial director for social sciences, who also heads its Woodstock, Oxfordshire-based European office, describes her press as “bridging the gap”. She says: “We publish the kinds of books that commercial academic presses don’t. We’re between the Routledges and the Palgrave Macmillans and the Penguins and the Bloomsburys. It is a quite an important space between the academy and the real world, as we make research accessible to a broader audience. We are contributing informed interventions in the public debates for key issues of the day.” Current and upcoming titles that straddle that academic/trade divide include Susan Schneider’s Artificial You, a “sober-minded” philosophical look into AI; economist Jonathan Rothwell’s manifesto for a just societ, A Republic of Equals; and French cognitive scientist Hugo Mercier’s Not Born Yesterday, which looks at the science behind how people decide who they can trust.

Macmillans and the Penguins and the

Bloomsburys. It is quite an

important space Sarah Caro, PUP

A subject Caro thinks universit presses must tackle, and one she has put much energy into, is diversit. This is not just about staff— she acknowledges that a rural Oxfordshire

publisher has to work harder to be more inclusive in its recruitment—but in its output: “It’s really important to have diversit in our author base. A conundrum is how to maintain a high reputation and the qualit of our work, while at the same time broadening the base of authors and not just publishing books by people at top-ranked institutions. This is not just race but gender. For example, one of the areas I work in, economics, has poor representation of women at high levels in faculties. So we are working with the academy to try to overcome this.”

throws up a number of thorny issues: Is there a hard business case for accessibility, or is this part of social responsibility? What sort of pricing strategies should be implemented? How can the metadata make it clearer about the accessibility of particular formats? On hand for the opening keynote is Hugo Setzer, c.e.o. of Mexican publisher Manuel Moderno and president of the International Publishers Association. He will speak about what the trade body is doing to boost accessibility. Julie Fairweather, director of the Canadian government’s Book Publishing & Policy Programs, will outline the legal framework and funding her country has instituted around the accessibility issue. The annual convention

has expanded in each year after its launch; this year, 150 delegates from 25 countries will attend.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36