Efficiency Sickness, agency use, leavers and training
records can provide further context. A team relying heavily on unfamiliar agency colleagues may need longer handovers. A rise in missed clockings among new starters may point to an onboarding gap. Regular overtime may be masking a vacancy that has remained open too long. Managers should also compare clocking
patterns with quality information. A shift that repeatedly overruns alongside an increase in incomplete documentation, incidents or complaints requires a different response from an isolated payroll discrepancy. No single metric provides control - the value comes from seeing patterns across staffing, workload and care quality, then knowing where to investigate.
Automation should support judgement With around 50,000 clock records being generated each day across the data analysed, reviewing every entry manually would be neither practical nor useful. Automation can align straightforward records with agreed shifts, identify anomalies and bring exceptions to a manager’s attention. It can reduce repetitive administration and make the process more consistent. However, it should not remove human
judgement. A system cannot know why a resident required additional support or whether an employee had been asked to stay. It cannot decide whether a pattern reflects poor practice, an unrealistic rota or a team going beyond what was planned. The best use of technology is to narrow the manager’s field of attention. It should answer: where should I look, what has changed and which records require a decision? If it simply produces another dashboard containing more numbers, it may create the appearance of control without helping the manager to act.
Protect trust in pay and scheduling Few things damage the relationship between a provider and its workforce more quickly than uncertainty about pay. Colleagues need confidence that the hours they work will be recorded accurately and that corrections will be handled promptly. Managers also need confidence that they are applying the same rules fairly across the team. This is why communication matters. Employees should be told how clocking information is used, what snap-to-shift means in practice and how to challenge a record. New starters and agency colleagues need the same clarity.
Managers should avoid presenting
variance reviews as an attempt to catch people out. The process should identify unpaid working time as readily as it identifies records that exceed scheduled hours without an operational reason. When employees understand that the aim
is accurate pay and a more realistic rota, the data can support constructive conversations. It can also help managers demonstrate when a workload problem is genuine, because they have evidence that shifts are consistently departing from plan.
A rota should describe reality The 37-minute variance is not a target to eliminate. It is a sign of how much activity can sit between the published rota and the working day. Care will always require flexibility. Residents’ needs change, emergencies happen and colleagues support one another. A perfectly static rota would not necessarily be evidence of a well-run home. Good control means being able to see
when the plan changes, understand the reason and respond appropriately. It means paying people accurately while recognising where additional hours are becoming routine. It means using exceptions to improve the rota rather than repeatedly correcting the same records. Care managers can begin by reviewing
where their largest variances occur, separating genuine working time from clocking behaviour and asking employees what sits behind repeated patterns. They can then make sure tolerances remain appropriate, approval is consistent and workforce information is considered alongside occupancy, dependency and quality.
38
www.thecarehomeenvironment.com November 2026 The rota tells a home what is supposed to
happen. Clocking information shows what was recorded. The gap between the two is not merely a payroll issue. It can reveal pressure, process weaknesses and a staffing plan that no longer reflects the needs of the home.n
Iain Corrigan
Iain Corrigan is commercial director at CoolCare, where he leads the sales and account management teams, building strong, profitable and long- term relationships with care home customers. With more than 20 years’ experience across sales and account management, Iain is a commercially focused and results-driven leader with a strong track record of delivering new business and exceeding revenue targets. Having spent over five years at CoolCare, he is passionate about continuous improvement and helping care providers get the most from their operations, combining commercial insight with a collaborative, relationship-led approach.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44
