Efficiency A clock record does not always tell a


manager when someone began or stopped working. An employee might arrive early, clock in and then wait for their shift to start. Someone may clock out late because they remained on site after finishing their duties. Conversely, an employee may begin working before clocking in, continue working after clocking out or forget to record part of their time. These situations cannot all be treated in


the same way. Any time genuinely worked must be captured and handled in accordance with employment law, contracts and the provider’s policies. Managers also need a fair process for identifying records that do not represent additional working time. The objective is therefore not to force


every clock record to match the rota. It is to make sure that genuine work is recognised, payroll records are accurate and recurring discrepancies are understood. That distinction is important because if


workforce control is presented purely as cutting minutes, it can undermine trust and encourage managers to overlook the pressures, causing shifts to overrun. Used properly, clocking data should protect employees as well as the provider.


Why small differences matter more Workforce costs have always represented a significant proportion of care home expenditure. The financial pressure has now intensified. The national living wage increased by


4.1 per cent to £12.71 an hour in April this year. Skills for Care estimated that the adult social care wage bill in England reached £31.8 billion in 2024/25, an increase of 12.6 per cent in one year. At the same time, providers must maintain


safe staffing, respond to changes in residents’ needs and compete for workers in a difficult labour market. There is a floor below which staffing cannot safely fall, regardless of occupancy or financial pressure. This makes accurate workforce


information essential. Managers need to know whether the planned rota reflects the hours being delivered, whether additional time is being authorised consistently and


whether payroll is based on reliable records. Small variances become particularly


important when they repeat. A few additional minutes on one shift may have little effect. The same pattern across several employees, every day and in multiple homes may indicate a wider problem with workload, handovers, scheduling or clocking behaviour. Good control is about understanding


what was planned, what happened and why the two were different - not about paying people less.


Do not manage by the average alone The average adjustment of 37 minutes is useful because it illustrates scale, but it cannot explain what is happening in an individual service. An average can combine early clock-


ins, late clock-outs, missed records and genuine extensions to shifts. It can also be distorted by a smaller number of very large discrepancies. Managers should therefore resist the temptation to set a target based on the headline figure alone. The first step is to split the data into


meaningful categories. Managers should examine early starts separately from late finishes and compare short shifts with others that exceed the planned duration. They should also distinguish authorised overtime from unexplained additional hours. The information then becomes more


useful when it is broken down by home, department, role, shift and day of the week.


A group-wide figure may look reasonable while concealing a recurring problem within one service. Likewise, one unusual week should not automatically lead to a change in policy if the longer-term pattern is stable. Managers should also look at the


distribution, not simply the mean. How many shifts fall within the home’s normal tolerance? How many are moderate exceptions? How many are large enough to require investigation? This gives a much more accurate picture than one average number. Most importantly, the data should prompt


a conversation rather than deliver a verdict. It can identify where managers should look, but it cannot explain the circumstances on its own.


What common patterns reveal Different types of variance often point


towards different operational questions: n Regular early clock-ins Repeated early arrivals do not necessarily mean that extra work is being completed. Colleagues may be working around bus timetables, sharing lifts or arriving early because parking becomes difficult at shift- change time. However, managers should check whether


employees are beginning duties before their scheduled start. If they are routinely helping with breakfast, responding to call bells or preparing medication before the paid shift begins, the rota may not reflect the real staffing requirement. The response should not be to ignore the additional time or just tell people to


If workforce control is presented purely as cutting


minutes, it can undermine trust and encourage managers to overlook the pressures causing shifts to overrun


36 www.thecarehomeenvironment.com November 2026


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44