Comment


CARE HOME


ENVIRONMENT www.thecarehomeenvironment.com Editor


Mary-Louise Clews marylouiseclews@stepcomms.com


Business Manager Mike Gammon mikegammon@stepcomms.com


Journal Administration Katy Cockle


katycockle@stepcomms.com Design


Steven Dillon


Publisher Geoff King


geoffking@stepcomms.com


Publishing Director Trevor Moon


trevormoon@stepcomms.com


THE CARE HOME ENVIRONMENT is published monthly by Step Communications Ltd, Step House, North Farm Road, Tunbridge Wells, Kent TN2 3DR, UK. Tel: +44 (0)1892 779999


Email: info@thecarehomeenvironment.com Web: www.thecarehomeenvironment.com


The Welltower wake-up call


Mary-Louise Clews, Editor marylouiseclews@stepcomms.com


The Competition and Market Authority’s (CMA) initial ruling that US real estate investment trust (REIT)Welltower’s acquisition of over 600 UK care homes could be anti-competitive in some areas immediately reset market expectations (see news P9), according to discussions I’ve had, and missives shared online from legal, financial and other sector experts, who, at time of writing, were still digesting the news. As TCHE went to press, the CMA


announced it ‘proposed to accept’ a package offered by the firm to sell some homes, and change operators of others, to head-off competition fears in 30 areas. The regulator was set to launch a


consultation on the proposed changes, which it promised it would reveal in more detail to the market. But, almost regardless of what happens


ISSN NO. 2398-3280 ©2026 Step Communications


The Publisher is unable to take any responsibility for views expressed by contributors. Editorial views are not necessarily shared by the journal. Readers are expressly advised that while the contents of this publication are believed to be accurate, correct and complete, no reliance should be placed upon its contents as being applicable to any particular circumstances.


This publication is copyright under the Berne Convention and the International Copyright Convention. All rights reserved, apart from any copying under the UK Copyright Act 1956, part 1, section 7. Multiple copies of the contents of the publication without permission is always illegal.


next, the initial CMA decision already means that it is no longer business as usual for large US owned REITs investing in the UK. The big issue at the heart of the regulator’s decision, I’m told, is its signal that it will now take an interest in owners or landlords of care facilities and not just the operators. The reason Welltower has come under


the regulator’s microscope is the type of ownership structure its acquisitions are being made under – known as a RIDEA ( REIT Investment Diversification and Empowerment Act), which allows healthcare REITs to partner with operators, sharing in both the operational income and expenses of care facilities, rather than receiving passive,


Follow our page on Linkedin June 2026 www.thecarehomeenvironment.com 5


fixed rent under traditional ‘triple net leases’. It is this interest in, and potential ability


to influence the operation of a care home or group of facilities that has caused them to come unstuck and trigger the CMA investigation. So, what next? A diversification of


ownership in the market is an inevitable outcome now Welltower has said it will sell off some homes and switch operators for others to address the regulators anticompetition concerns it was effectively creating a monopoly in some areas. Is this a good thing? Are there other investors out there with the means to take on the investment needed? And will this result in a dampening of US interest in taking over our care home real estate, or just keep specialist mergers and acquisitions lawyers in lucrative employment? For those with a financial interest in the


UK care home property market, these are all live questions right now. But more broadly, what does it mean for the care of our older, more vulnerable citizens? How will the supply of affordable, good quality care beds be impacted? Does it matter if a firm on the other side of the Atlantic is ultimately responsible for the quality of care our older relatives receive? What does it mean for the Care Quality Commission (CQC) and its jurisdiction over owners and operators? These wider, vital questions should have


already been raised by everyone involved in older people’s care - from policymakers to families, but if they weren’t, they are now. The CMA’s ruling is a wake-up call for all of us.


THE


knut/stock.adobe.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43