Lighting
ranging from mild fatigue to genuine pain. They will not always identify the light as the cause, but will simply avoid the space, or become unsettled in it, and the reason may never be understood. Directing light away from reflective surfaces and toward matt or textured ones is often a simple adjustment with significant consequences.
Evening descent This is the principle most consistently absent from care home design, and the one with the most direct impact on how residents sleep and feel. As the day moves toward evening, the lighting needs to change. Not dramatically, but gradually, in a way the body recognises as dusk, even when there is no window, no outdoor view, no natural signal available. It should be warmer in tone, lower in
intensity and move away from the ceiling and toward the edges and surfaces of the room. The communal space at seven in the evening should not look or feel like the same space at one in the afternoon. When this shift happens consistently, the body learns to trust it. A person within that environment does not need to consciously decide that the day is ending. The surroundings have already communicated that message. This is where the investment in variable
lighting – even a simple two-setting system with a daytime condition and an evening condition – begins to show measurable returns in sleep quality and evening calm.
Night safety without disturbance The challenge of night-time lighting in care settings is often framed as a conflict: enough light to prevent falls during overnight movement, versus enough darkness to allow sleep. These are not in conflict. The solution is specific. Low-level, warm light at floor or door-frame level that’s enough to illuminate the path from bed to bathroom, does not need to activate the circadian system to be effective. The spectrum of the light matters here as much as the intensity. Blue-enriched light suppresses melatonin even at low lux levels. Warm light at the same lux level does not. The difference between the two is a lamp specification choice, not a budget question.
The independence question There is one dimension of care home lighting that rarely appears in technical briefs and almost never appears in design specifications, but which I believe is central to the quality of life that the physical environment supports. In a standard
16
www.thecarehomeenvironment.com June 2026
residential setting, a switch is a convenience. In a care setting, it is an act of independence. If people living there can locate their own light switch, reach it without assistance, operate it with confidence, and see the result, they have retained something important. Agency over their own environment. The ability to make a small decision about their own comfort without requesting help from a member of staff. For someone whose autonomy is being reduced in multiple directions simultaneously, by mobility, by cognitive change, by the necessary routines of institutional care, this is not a trivial capability. It is supported or removed by the quality
and placement of the hardware itself. A control that requires fine motor precision, a plate that disappears against the wall colour, and a switch positioned for someone standing rather than someone seated. Each of these removes independence quietly, without intention. Considered hardware at the right height, with sufficient contrast, and that responds immediately and legibly, returns that independence just as quietly. The moment a hand reaches for a switch
and the light responds is the moment the built environment either supports or undermines the dignity of the person living in it.
What quality means in this context In many design contexts, quality is described in material and aesthetic terms; the precision of the finish, the weight of the surface, the considered restraint of a well-made object.
Those things matter, and they have their own place. But I am not writing from inside the care sector. I am writing as someone who has spent considerable time understanding how light affects human experience, who has looked at care environments from the outside, and who keeps seeing the same gap. In a care setting, that language needs to
mean something different. Something more specific, and more demanding. Quality in a care setting means a morning that still feels like morning. An afternoon that does not blur into the evening. An evening that permits rest rather than interrupting it. A day that still has a shape, a rhythm, a beginning and an end. For a person who cannot step outside to feel the change of the light, the building is the only source of those signals. The light within it is the only cue the body receives about where it is in the day. Getting this right is not an aesthetic
consideration. It is not a premium option or a finishing touch. It is the quality of the life being lived there. The brief for residential care, at any scale,
in any setting, is one of the most demanding in-built environment designs. It asks for clinical rigour and human warmth in the same space, for the same person, across the same day. Lighting that addresses the circadian needs of older, more vulnerable people, supports safe mobility, enables independence, and creates a coherent daily rhythm is not a complication of that brief. It is the brief. n
Michael Bamling SCAN HERE
Or visit the website here:
www.corston.com
Michael Bamling is a creative lighting consultant and author of Chiaroscuro: Light, Rhythm, and the Experience of Home. He advises on lighting strategy for residential, hospitality, and care settings, with a focus on how light behaviour shapes human experience across the day.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43
