search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
DIAGNOSTICS


Pre-analytical errors: how to detect and interpret HIL interference


In diagnostic testing errors can occur at any stage of testing, with pre-analytical interference from haemolysis, icterus, and lipaemia (HIL) being particularly common. HIL interference can lead to inaccurate results and is therefore a major concern for clinical laboratories. Jason Armstrong explores the causes and effects of HIL interference and discuss strategies for its detection and mitigation in clinical laboratory analysis.


Errors can occur at any stage in the pre- analytical, analytical, or post-analytical stage of a diagnostic test. It is general practice for errors in the analytical stage to be identified through quality control procedures. However, pre-analytical errors are often treated with less importance than those in later stages of testing. Interference caused by haemolysis, icterus and lipaemia (HIL) are common forms of pre-analytical error which affect assay methods, yielding erroneous results. HIL interference is not novel and has been historically identified through a series of visual assessments.


While haemolytic, icteric and lipaemic interference causes a visual change in the sample, these methods are not quantitative and are subject to interpretation by laboratory professionals. Modern analysers have built-in capabilities for the automated detection of HIL interference which can quantitatively or semi-quantitatively measure haemolysis, icterus and lipaemia, and provide and an index for each. This data can then be used to determine if a sample should be accepted for testing or rejected due to intrinsic interference.


Haemolysis Around 30% of samples received from emergency rooms are subject to haemolysis and therefore, are rejected for testing.1


Haemolytic interference


occurs as a result of degradation of red blood cells due to tangential stress which causes a denaturation of the membrane and the release of erythrocyte components. This is commonly due to poor sample collection technique, poor sample storage, or inadequate sample transportation.2


Haemolysis can cause


interference through various mechanisms, the most common is the presence of erythrocyte intracellular components, due to the degradation of cells, which are detected by assays and result in falsely high results in those analytes


2.0 2.5 3.0


0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5


Haemolysis


already present in high concentrations within the cell and falsely low results for analytes of low intracellular concentration. Additionally, erythrocyte components such as haemoglobin, potassium ions, and aspartate aminotransferase can cause degradation to some analytes such insulin and troponin T.1


measured at 340-440nm and 540- 580nm3


greatest absorbance at 415nm,1


Haemolysis is likely to affect assays as haemoglobin exhibits its


causing


interference in diagnostic tests such as those for iron, lipase and albumin.1


Icterus


Lipaemia 300 350 400 450 500 550 Wavelength (Nm)


A graph displaying wavelengths at which interference caused by haemolysis, icterus and lipaemia are likely to be evident.


WWW.PATHOLOGYINPRACTICE.COM JUNE 2023 49 600 650 700 750


Absorbance


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56