search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
INFECTION PREVENTION AND CONTROL


that means bathrooms, offices, hallways. Stuff gets missed.”


Hospital rooms may be cleaned for half the time as a typical hotel room, Zuberi asserted, and not all rooms are cleaned daily. What’s more, not all surfaces are cleaned thoroughly – with the right chemicals, in the right concentrations, and for the right length of time.


“Cleaners do not know how to get surfaces microbially safe - it’s just superficial,” said Prof Assadian. “They may not fully understand the difference between cleaning and disinfecting; after all, a toilet cleaned in two minutes may appear sparkling but remain teeming with pathogens.” Numerous studies have linked outsourced cleaning to higher rates of infection. Among 126 English NHS hospitals studied, those using outsourced cleaners reported nearly 50% more MRSA infections than hospitals with in-house cleaners. “Contracting out NHS services may save


money, but this is at the price of increasing risks to patients’ health,” wrote study co- author David Stuckler, PhD, MPH, a public health expert at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. “When these full costs are taken into account, contracting may prove to be a false economy.”46


territory in a paper titled “Superbugs versus outsourced cleaners.”47 superbugs win.


American researchers explored the same Their conclusion:


Among 126 English NHS hospitals studied, those using outsourced cleaners reported nearly 50% more MRSA infections than hospitals with in-house cleaners.


Their study of California hospitals found “strong evidence” linking outsourced cleaning to incidence of C. difficile, a bacterium that can form spores that linger on sheets, floors, and toilets, and is readily spread via equipment and human hands. In this study, 73% of hospitals that did not outsource cleaning reported C. difficile cases in the year studied. But among hospitals that outsourced much of their cleaning, C. difficile infection incidence reached 91%.


The California study underscores a second reason hospital surface cleaning falls short: Even when it’s done right – when standards are high and in-house cleaning crews are motivated, well trained, and well paid – cleaning cannot wipe out pathogens for long. As anyone with a kitchen knows, “clean” is a temporary condition. In a study of a medical intensive care unit (MICU) in South Carolina, 36 bed rails were sampled for bacteria immediately before cleaning with two different hospital-approved disinfectants and checked at four intervals afterward. One disinfectant was more effective than the other, but in both cases,


within three hours of disinfection, the bacterial burdens had rebounded to unacceptable levels.48 “Our study suggests that cleaning approximately every two hours would be necessary to maintain the population of this pathogen at the proposed nondetectable level,” the researchers concluded. This is no small finding, as bed rails are the most contaminated surfaces in a hospital room,49


and dangerous microbes are easily transferred from bed rails to healthcare workers’ hands.


A study conducted in Chicago, for example, found VRE bacteria were transferred to gloved hands nearly half of the time after contact with bed rails. In fact, healthcare workers were almost as likely to have contaminated their hands or gloves after touching objects in a patient’s room as after touching infected patients themselves.50


And transfer of VRE


happens quickly: 46% of handprint cultures grew VRE after five seconds of contact with the bed rail or side table in a patient’s room. It goes without saying that no hospital can afford to disinfect bed rails 12 times a day.


SEPTEMBER 2018


WWW.CLINICALSERVICESJOURNAL.COM I


43


t


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80