search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
t


CSC ANNUAL SCIENTIFIC MEETING


Thefutureofsterilisation and decontamination


The Central Sterilising Club Annual Scientific Meeting provided an excellent learning opportunity for all those involved in decontamination - from hands-on operatives, decontamination managers and infection prevention practitioners to associated professionals. With a focus on extending knowledge and improving practice, this year’s event was yet another success.


The Central Sterilising Club (CSC) holds two educational events every year, both being accredited for continuing professional development (CPD), which is currently organised through the Royal College and Pathologist’s scheme. The programme is submitted for review and an appropriate number of CPD points allocated to the content. The first of the CSC events is a two-day Annual Scientific Meeting which is held in the Spring and comprises a formal programme of lectures, from invited speakers, and a selected number of corporate presentations, which combine to cover a broad range of hot topics. It also includes The Kelsey Lecture which was established in 1980 through a donation made by Dr Jos Kelsey to enable a guest lecturer of international repute to be invited to speak at the conference. CSC chair, Val O’Brien welcomed delegates to the Worsley Park Marriott Hotel & Country Club in Manchester and announced that, due to the success of the annual meeting, the 2020 event will take


MAY 2019


place at an even larger venue. Opening proceedings was Dr Robert


Spencer, who recently retired from working full time as a medical microbiologist after 45 years in the discipline. Setting the scene, Dr Spencer looked to the future: “There are many questions that must be asked about the future of the NHS. There are a number of unknowns facing us, such as robotic surgery and the impact of antimicrobial resistance. There will be less operations, as the risk will be too high, and we know that there are still 1.5 million unknown viruses.


“Social media is also having an effect on the public perception of infection prevention, with the influx of ‘fake news’ and the number of parents refusing to have their children immunised. This has resulted in an increase in mumps and measles. A major concern is global warming. With no water, we have no steam, and no sterilisation.” One of the highlights of the Annual Scientific Meeting is the Kelsey Lecture, this year presented by Margreet C. Vos, professor


in medical microbiology, infection prevention, Erasmus MC, in the Netherlands. Margreet’s talk covered the failure of cleaning and disinfection of endoscopes; prevalence, impact and future solutions. “With regard to the impact of infections, we are at the tip of a huge iceberg,” she asserted. “The source of bacteria may be endogenous – inherent to the ERCP procedure, the translocation of a patient’s own flora – or exogenous, contaminated ERCP duodenoscopes with biomaterial from previous patients or contamination by AER, drying or storage. The risks are caused by breaches in reprocessing or the complex design of the equipment. “The impact of contaminated endoscopes is an unresolved issue. Up until now there is no data on the contamination of endoscopes before a procedure and measurement of infection after a procedure. So, is an infection related to a contaminated endoscope, or is it endogenous? The risk on exogenous infection is not known.”


WWW.CLINICALSERVICESJOURNAL.COM I 41


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72