News NHS robotic surgery rollout is a “postcode lottery”, warns RCS
Patients face a postcode lottery in accessing robotic-assisted surgery on the NHS, new analysis by the Royal College of Surgeons of England (RCS England) has revealed. Published at the Future of Surgery Festival, the data shows that, despite national guidance from NHS England, there are major differences in how the technology is funded, distributed and used across NHS Trusts in England. Freedom of Information data from NHS Trusts
raises concerns about equitable access for patients. The data also shows that some hospitals rely on charitable fundraising to purchase robotic platforms. For example, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust reported spending more than £2 million raised through donations, underlining how access to cutting edge care can depend on local fundraising rather than consistent NHS funding. NHS England plans to dramatically increase the
use of surgical robots, with half a million robotic- assisted operations a year by 2035, suggesting the technology is expected to become routine for many minimally invasive procedures. But the new analysis suggests a clear gap between national ambition and frontline reality, with no consistent strategy for how robotic surgery should be funded, distributed or used across the NHS. This reflects a broader lack of coordinated national planning, with decisions about robotic surgery often made locally rather than as part of a joined-up NHS strategy. The data shows that: l Access to robotic-assisted surgery varies significantly by region, resulting in a postcode
RCS England says that realising the benefits of robotic-assisted surgery for patients will require: l The government to create a national public directory of surgical robotic systems, alongside the national robotic surgery registry that is currently being commissioned, to enable better national planning, equity of access, and efficient use of resources.
l A clearer, more consistent funding model, including centralised capital funding, so Trusts avoid relying on piecemeal local or charitable funding and to support equitable access for patients.
lottery for patients, with some parts of the country having far greater access to robotic systems than others. For example, while some Trusts have multiple robotic systems, others have none. NHS Trusts in the London region together have 28 systems, compared with just 6 across Trusts in the Southwest NHS region and 15 in the East of England.
l There is no standard, consistent funding model for robotic surgery across the NHS, with Trusts relying on a mix of capital funding, leasing and managed service agreements, cost-per-case arrangements, and in a number of cases, charitable funding.
l There is no single, transparent national dataset on robotic surgery provision routinely or consistently available at a national level, making it difficult for NHS England, DHSC and ICBs to plan services strategically, assess equity of access and ensure value for money as robotic surgery expands.
l Investment plans that reflect the full cost of robotic surgery, including workforce, training, infrastructure, maintenance, consumables and productivity, not just robotic platforms themselves
l Better use of existing robotic systems, with staffing planned to enable access across different surgical specialties and use throughout the working week, maximising patient benefit and value for money.
l A continued focus on training, governance and patient safety, with strong clinical oversight and access to structured training for the whole surgical team. RCS England has set out clear expectations through its updated good practice guidance on robotic-assisted surgery.
l Action from industry to improve affordability and sustainability including more support for refurbished systems and flexible financial models to give more opportunity for Trusts to acquire surgical robots.
June 2026 I
www.clinicalservicesjournal.com 13
Master Video -
stock.adobe.com
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72
