search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Comment EDITOR’S COMMENTwith LOUISE FRAMPTON THE CLINICAL SERVICES JOURNAL Editor


Louise Frampton louiseframpton@stepcomms.com


Technical Editor Kate Woodhead


Journal Administration Katy Cockle katycockle@stepcomms.com


Design Steven Dillon


Business Manager


James Scrivens jamesscrivens@stepcomms.com


Senior Sales Executive Adam Yates adamyates@stepcomms.com


Publisher Geoff King geoffking@stepcomms.com


Publishing Director Trevor Moon trevormoon@stepcomms.com


STEP COMMUNICATIONS ISSN No. 1478-5641


© Step Communications Ltd, 2026 Single copy: £19.00 per issue. Annual journal subscription: UK £114.00 Overseas: £150.00


The Clinical Services Journal is published in January, February, March, April, May, June, August, September, October and November by Step Communications Ltd, Step House, North Farm Road, Tunbridge Wells, Kent TN2 3DR, UK.


Tel: +44 (0)1892 779999 Email: info@clinicalservicesjournal.com Web: www.clinicalservicesjournal.com


The Publisher is unable to take any responsibility for views


expressed by contributors. Editorial views are not necessarily shared by the journal. Readers are expressly advised that while the contents of this publication are believed to be accurate, correct and complete, no reliance should be placed upon its contents as being applicable to any particular circumstances.


This publication is copyright under the Berne Convention and the International Copyright Convention.


All rights reserved, apart from any copying under the UK


Copyright Act 1956, part 1, section 7. Multiple copies of the contents of the publication without permission is always illegal.


Follow the CSJ LinkedIn page. Search Clinical Services Journal


Still waiting for a way forward…


The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) is warning that 2026 must be a turning point for women waiting for gynaecology care and is calling on the UK Government to go further and faster to tackle the gynaecology waiting list crisis. Despite Government commitments to reduce NHS waiting lists, the picture for women remains deeply concerning over a year on from the RCOG’s Waiting for a Way Forward report. The number of women on waiting lists only dropped by 3% since November 2024 with 743,312 women remaining on the list. If every woman currently waiting stood shoulder to shoulder, the queue would stretch over 191 miles – just one mile shorter than a year ago – taking almost two full days to walk from end to end.


Demand in England has grown, with 1.61 million gynaecology referrals between October 2024


– October 2025, up from 1.22 million between October 2019 and October 2020 - an increase of around 24%. To meet the Government’s target of seeing 92% of patients within 18 weeks by March 2029, performance would need to improve by around 1 percentage point every month from now on. Based on the current trajectory, the Government will fail to meet this target. New analysis also reveals deep and persistent inequalities across England:


l Women living in the most deprived areas make up the highest share of those waiting the longest for care. They account for 15% of those waiting more than 52 weeks, compared with 7% from the least deprived areas.


l Waiting lists have risen most sharply among women from Black and Asian backgrounds, and incomplete ethnicity data suggests the true scale may be underestimated.


RCOG is calling on the Government to deliver urgent support for women waiting now, protect and expand Women’s Health Hubs so care is available closer to home, and using the renewal of the Women’s Health Strategy and 10-Year Health Plan to fix the underlying capacity issues driving long waits.


Dr. Alison Wright, President of the RCOG said: “Our members are working tirelessly to meet rising demand, but pressures across services mean capacity is stretched at every stage of care. With the right investment, there is a real opportunity to change this situation for women. By re-prioritising the health needs of 51% of the population, we can make genuine improvements to women’s lives - ensuring they can access the high-quality care they need, when they need it.” While waiting, women are impacted by serious, often painful gynaecological conditions that


have a devastating impact on their daily lives. Many are left struggling to work, care for families, or lead normal lives. India Weir, who shared her experience in 2024’s Waiting for a Way Forward report, is still waiting for the right gynaecological care more than a year later, despite having surgery in July 2025. She commented: “I often feel like I have to be the specialist in my own care, keeping track of every detail because I don’t know when I’ll next be able to speak to someone or even access my notes. I have no mental energy left for the parts of life that should feel normal - seeing friends, being with family, even planning a holiday.” NHS England’s own analysis shows that women make up a higher percentage of the waiting list (57%) compared to men (43%), and women are more likely to be waiting over 18 and 52 weeks than men. We must tackle this inequality. While some progress is being achieved in some areas of women’s health, with menopause being included in routine NHS health checks for the first time, the Government must go much further to reduce the waiting lists for women waiting in pain and distress. View the full report at: https://tinyurl.com/ytu8c9wk


louiseframpton@stepcomms.com Get in touch and give us your views, email me:


February 2026 I www.clinicalservicesjournal.com 5


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72