search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
EBME


Upscaling life-saving equipment in a crisis


Despite the challenges of international shortages of life-saving equipment, huge volumes of medical devices have been commissioned to provide monitoring and support for patients with COVID-19. Louise Frampton provides an insight into the extraordinary response by the clinical engineering community, during the coronavirus crisis, and the lessons that can be learned for the future.


New field hospitals and new COVID-19 hospital wards within our current NHS hospitals were transformed to provide contingency support for many of the thousands of sick patients with the COVID-19 virus. To commission the medical equipment country-wide required a monumental effort from the clinical engineering community, with many engineers from the public and private sectors teaming up to accelerate the process. The Nightingale Hospital at Excel,


London, was set up in just 10 days, with plans to provide up to 4,000 intensive care beds. The purchasing and commissioning equipment for the equivalent of 10 general hospitals was a huge undertaking – requiring an estimated 112,500 hours of hands-on time to get the devices to the patients. An


international shortage of medical equipment including ICU ventilators, infusion devices and patient monitoring made this even more of a challenge than could ever have been estimated.


Capacity expanded further with additional Nightingale hospitals across England, Scotland and Wales. This was in addition to the extra capacity already created for NHS Hospitals, freeing up more than 33,000 beds – the equivalent of more than 50 new hospitals.


While the nation gave a well-deserved standing ovation to the many healthcare workers that risked their own lives while delivering frontline care, we should also acknowledge the enormous engineering contribution provided behind the scenes, that enabled this care to be delivered safely.


Scaling up access to intensive care was made possible by the hard work of clinical engineers, who worked long hours, away from their families, overcoming significant challenges to turn exhibition halls into emergency field hospitals and operating theatres into ICUs. Dr. John Sandham provided operational advice for commissioning COVID-19 ICU bed spaces, on and off-site in the UK. He explains that an intensive care bed requires much greater volumes of equipment compared to a general bed – including items such as ventilators, patient monitors, defibrillators, syringe pumps, infusion pumps, flowmeters and piped gases. These devices all need to be assembled, checked, and installed into the bed space. To give an insight into the scale of


the effort, each intensive care bed space required, on average, around 15 pieces of equipment to support a single patient. For London’s Nightingale hospital, this equated to over 60,000 pieces of equipment – some of which was highly specialised – such as ventilators, humidifiers and patient warmers. Dr. Sandham points out that kitting out a new 400 bed general hospital, normally takes six months of planning and purchasing: “During normal operating conditions, there are often delays, as the lead in times for manufacturers differ. However, the speed in which the healthcare sector had to respond to the coronavirus was unprecedented.”


The MTS and Avensys team at NHS Nightingale London. 26 l WWW.CLINICALSERVICESJOURNAL.COM


This speed of response posed some key challenges and required conventional strategies to be adapted: “During the pandemic, buyers had to purchase whatever equipment they could lay their hands on; clinical engineers often did not know exactly what was going to arrive. It was delivered


OCTOBER 2020


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92