search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
REPORTS SOUTH AUSTRALIA


Analysts predict SkyCity Adelaide might have to pays $50m in fines following the state and federal investigations. Issues raised include non-compliance to which the casino has reacted by implementing a dedicated compliance team. SkyCity Adelaide


THE CASINO


Alongside fellow casino operators Crown Resorts and Star Entertainment Group, SkyCity Entertainment Group is also subject to an investigation by AUSTRAC over potential series breaches to national anti-money laundering laws.


At the moment the casino is working with financial crimes watchdog AUSTRAC and a commissioner which are conducting an independent review as part of two separate ongoing investigations.


Te review has been commissioned by CBS in response to findings after inquiries into Crown and Star Entertainment. Te review is due to be completed by February 2023.


AUSTRAC apparently conducted a review of the casino back in 2016 but didn’t find any issues. However a closer look in 2019 found concerns dating back to that time.


Te casino, SkyCity Adelaide, is the only one operating in South Australia and opened back in 1985 and spans two floors of a historic Railway Station building in Adelaide on the Torrens River banks. It currently operates just over a 1,000 gaming machines, 118 table games and 138 automated table games.


In 2014 the South Australian government implemented reforms to allow SkyCity to increase the number of EGMs that can be operated from 995 to 1,500 plus 200 gaming tables and 300 automated table games. To allow for the operation of any additional EGMs the casino is required to purchase additional entitlements.


Te casino was purchased by New Zealand’s SKyCity Entertainment Group and re-branded in 2000 and underwent various refurbishments completed in 2020. It features a 120 room luxury hotel, wellness centre, gym, conference facility, bars and restaurants. Te group operates four casinos in New Zealand and the SkyCity Online Casino. Te revenue from the SkyCity Adelaide in FY22 amounted to $171.8m.


Analysts are predicting that SkyCity Adelaide might have to cough up as much as $50m in fines following the state and federal investigations. In December, Australia's financial crimes watchdog, AUSTRAC, issued civil proceedings against SkyCity Adelaide. AUSTRAC alleges serious and systemic non-compliance with anti-money- laundering and counter-terrorism financing laws


It's the third civil case brought by AUSTRAC against casinos in Australia in the last


P44 WIRE / PULSE / INSIGHT / REPORTS


two years. Issues raised include non-compliance and the casino has reacted by implementing a dedicated compliance team, increase its staff in compliance and investments in infrastructure. Te civil proceedings follows the watchdog's investigation into the casino that began in 2021, as part of AUSTRAC's industry-wide compliance campaign.


AUSTRAC's investigation identified a range of circumstances where SkyCity failed to carry out appropriate ongoing customer due diligence. AUSTRAC claims that SkyCity also failed to develop and maintain a compliant AML/CTF programme, leaving it at risk of criminal exploitation.


THE POKIES


Te pokie sector has also come under scrutiny. At the end of 2020 new restrictive laws were introduced in South Australia for pokie machines to limit the maximum amount of withdrawal at venues to $200 per day.


Previously players could withdraw up to $1,000 per day (five withdraws of $200 per day) using an Etfpos machine at the pokie venues. But with one in 10 suicides linked to gambling addiction changes have been requested. Similar $200 limits apply in ACT and Tasmania.


When the new rules came into play, some venues in regional areas where operators said it was harder for players to access cash, applied for exemptions. Some were permitted to keep withdrawal limits of between $350 and $1,000 per day per card. However these too will need to comply with the new rules.


South Australians lost almost $770m on the pokies in the last financial year, the second highest number on record. Watchdog group SABest is campaigning to have Etfpos machines withdrawn completely from gambling venues.


EGMS were introduced into South Australia in 1994 following the Gaming Machines Act 1992.


In 2019 there were just under 13,000 EGMS in clubs and hotels in South Australia. Tere is a state-wide cap of 13,081 and there are continued attempts to reduce this further.


Te CBS first quarterly report (July-September) shows a total of 12,147 EGMs by September 2022 of which the largest amount were operated by Aristocrat with 40 per cent market share followed by IGT with 27 per cent.


To operate a pokie machine in South Australia


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178