search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ADDITIVES | SURFACE MODIFICATION


Croda’s range also includes products for


transparent polymers including polycarbonate and PMMA, which in applications such as headlights and interior parts can be prone to scratching if not coated. IncroMax products are said to show excellent anti-scratch performance with no nega- tive impact on clarity.


Figure 3: Comparison of visible blooming of a standard grade of erucamide versus Incroslip SL in a PP automotive compound after exposure to UV light.


Source: Croda


odour and maintained gloss. “This combination of benefits makes them perfect for use in a variety of polymers and applications from high gloss surfaces to transparent parts,” says the company’s Global Marketing Manager Jill Ullathorne. Incroslip G, which is intended for PP homopoly- mer applications, is a type of erucamide with enhanced thermal and oxidative stability. It has been available for some time but its use as an anti-scratch additive is quite recent. Aside from its cosmetic improvement, it has the added benefit of reducing mould release force so eliminates the need for external mould release agents during injection moulding. Two proprietary formulations for impact copolymers, Incroslip SL and IncroMold K, have been on the market for three years, which is relatively new in automotive testing terms, says Ullathorne. All of the Croda additives are said to be able to withstand challenging processing conditions and offer long term in-use performance in the finished products. Additionally, their low usage levels do not cause any detrimental effect on mechanical properties.


Method of operation The method of operation of an anti-scratch additive is quite complex and is influenced by polymer type, structure and temperature. Croda Europe Research Fellow Adam Maltby explains that migrating anti-scratch additives are designed to be compat- ible with the polymer melt during processing but to become insoluble in the matrix and migrate to the surface as the polymer cools. Migration is faster through amorphous regions of the polymer and at higher temperatures (up to 50-60°C); it is retarded in highly crystalline polymers, at low temperature and by the presence of adsorbing or solubilising components in the formulation. Once the additive has migrated to the surface of


the part it forms lubricating solid layers. These cause scratching indenters to slide across the surface, thus reducing scratch visibility (Figure 4). Maltby says that among the more traditional additives available, erucamide has proved to be very good where high slip/scratch performance is required while oleamide is a good choice for applications requiring fast migration.


Polymer alternatives Polymer makers are also working hard at modifying and improving surface properties, reducing or possibly even eliminating the need for extra addi- tives or for surface coating of finished parts. At the Fakuma plastics processing show in Friedrichshafen, Germany, last month, BASF showed its new Ultramid Deep Gloss specialty polyamide. This combines the chemical resistance of semi-crystalline polyamides


Figure 4: Bruker profilometry images show how IncroMold K reduces scratch depth – and hence visibility – by 80% in a PP impact copolymer compound at an addition rate of 1% (8N load)


60 COMPOUNDING WORLD | November 2017


Source: Croda www.compoundingworld.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88