search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
EGG PRODUCTION ▶▶▶


Efficiency challenges of cage-free eggs


The global move towards cage-free egg production seems to be unstoppable. Far from being restricted to Europe and North America, the commitment of many large egg producers, retailers, food service companies and hotel groups to ban cage eggs from their supply chains is making cage-free eggs a global and ever increasing reality.


BY JOEL ESTEVINHO, ALLTECH T


he agri-food industry is under growing scrutiny for its contribution to global warming. Feed contributes to about 80% of poultry’s carbon footprint. The lower feed conversion efficiency associated with


cage-free production comes with an environmental burden. When expressed as kilograms of CO2


-equivalent per kilo of


eggs produced, aviary and free-range farming increase emis- sions by 12–13% compared to furnished cages, while organic egg production yields 37% more emissions than furnished cages. Differences in feed utilisation account for about 68% and 43% of these disparities, respectively. Looking at these figures there seems to be potential to improve the sustaina- bility of cage-free egg production by optimising efficiency. Some options that may help producers achieve this goal are outlined below.


Economic impact Cage-free systems are generally less efficient than egg pro- duction in cages. A renowned breeding company recently published standards for cage, barn/aviary and free-range egg production. Accord- ing to those standards, the average daily feed intake is mod- erately higher in cage-free flocks (+7% and +8%, respectively for barn/aviary and free-range, compared to cages). Cage- free flocks also have much higher cumulative bird mortality than caged flocks (+21% and +43%, respectively for barn/ aviary and free-range). For details of the causes which explain the differences in bird mortality rates between housing systems, please see the article “Cage-free egg producion and welfare implications”, previously published in this series.


26 ▶ POULTRY WORLD | No. 2, 2022


When the overall impact of the differences in performance is calculated for a production cycle up to 100 weeks of age, the higher cumulative feed intake in barn/aviary and free-range production settings compared to cages (+4.8 kg and +5.3 kg), with an average feed price of € 350 per tonne, amounts to ex- tra feed costs of € 1.68 and € 1.86 per hen housed, respective- ly, for barn/aviary and free-range operations. For the lower cumulative egg mass (-0.3 kg and -0.7 kg, respectively), using an average egg price of € 1.20 per kg, the negative impact corresponds to a lower egg income of € 0.36 and € 0.84, re- spectively. Taken together, the increase in feed intake and re- duction in egg output, compared to production in cages, will cost at least € 2.04 per hen housed for an aviary/barn egg producer and at least € 2.70 per hen housed for a free-range egg producer. In addition to the greater intake, other factors contribute to the decreased efficiency of cage-free systems when it comes to converting feed into eggs. When housed in cage-free premises, chickens have contact with soil, litter and manure; this exposes them to higher loads of enteric bacteria, coccidia and other parasites than they would be exposed to in cages. A recent study has reported diminished intestinal health in birds in cage-free production systems compared to caged birds, with the former tending to have a lower villus height to crypt depth ratio in several segments of the intestine. This can lead to lower intestinal absorption of nutrients and indi- cates a greater proliferation of new cells for the intestinal lin- ing, which is energetically demanding (and, thus, unfavoura- ble for feed efficiency). The hens used in the study were reported as healthy, which highlights the widespread impact of floor contact on gut health and feed efficiency, even in healthy, cage-free flocks. Actigen is a second-generation, unique bio-active product derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a strain of yeast selected by Alltech and isolated to create a more effective product to optimise gut health. A comprehensive review has been published by Spring and others (2015). Actigen participates in normalising gut microflora and promoting microbiome diversity, helping to maintain gastrointestinal integrity and stability in birds and aiding nutrient utilisation. It works to support immune defences, gut health, gut func- tion and development, thereby promoting overall health and performance. For further details of the improvement in gut


PHOTO:ALLTECH


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36