STRATEGY ▶▶▶
Relying on soybean meal alone can be risky
At a time when China has issued immediate guidelines recommending a reduction of corn and soymeal in feed due to a drop in state stockpiles, researchers in the UK have looked further into the future. It’s still early days but trials for soybean meal replacements in poultry rations through optimising other protein sources are encouraging.
BY TONY MCDOUGAL AND NATALIE BERKHOUT S
oybean meal and corn are the go-to protein sources in vegetable animal feed production. And with good harvests and a functioning worldwide trade they are easily accessible, too. But relying on these sources
alone and expecting that they will always be freely available and at reasonable price levels all over the globe, is risky. Just re- cently China issued guidelines for a reduction of corn and soy- meal in feed, Reuters reports. To compensate for the domestic shortfall, China began importing corn but in the meantime, feed manufacturers have been switching to cheaper alterna- tives, especially wheat which has more protein than corn and has already cut demand for soymeal. China consumes about 175 million metric tonnes (mmt) of corn in animal feed every year and this figure is set to rise. The country also imports about 100 mmt of soybeans, also for animal feed.
Available alternatives The Chinese ministry of agriculture said that rice, cassava, rice bran, barley and sorghum were also suitable alternatives to corn, while rapeseed meal, cottonseed meal, peanut meal, sunflower meal, distillers dried grains, palm meal, flaxmeal, sesame meal and corn processing by-products were good op- tions to replace soymeal. Reuters further reported that some analysts questioned whether China’s huge appetite for im- ported feed grain would be reduced much by alternative feeds that are produced in much smaller volumes than corn and soy. The ministry provided some suggested feed formula- tions depending on the region of the country. In some regions, it recommended eliminating soymeal completely and replacing it with other meals.
Alternative proteins Where the Chinese are looking for readily available alternatives, researchers in the UK are looking in an entirely new direction. Speaking at the final session of the British farmers’ union poul- try research seminars, Professor Emily Burton of Nottingham Trent University touched on a new initiative that involved recy- cling industrial carbon dioxide into cost-competitive protein for high value, sustainable animal feed. The React-First project, led by Deep Branch Biotechnology, captures carbon dioxide in Proton, a single-cell protein optimised for animal feed via a proprietary gas fermentation process. This – the first of three phases – is currently being scaled up ahead of co-development with market-leading feed producers. The first poultry trial is due this August with the aim of eventually producing animal products with up to 60% less greenhouse gas emissions throughout the total value chain. Another initiative which could pay dividends as a replacement for soybean meal is a bioethanol protein concentrate project. The aim is to create a more sustainable protein product for the sector with an increased protein content and decreased amount of fibre, as well as avoid recombining thin stillage and cake. Trials have shown that ring dried, wheat bioethanol pro- tein concentrate added as a partial replacement for soya in pel- leted diets can lead to a significantly improved feed conversion ratio (FCR) at all inclusion levels when fed to chicks from hatch to 22 days. Professor Burton noted that our social responsibility requires us to reduce the carbon footprint associated with poultry meat: “Proton from React-First may offer a very low car- bon alterative to soya in the future. MSC [protein recovery] from the bioethanol protein concentrate project offers a lower carbon alternative to soya. But we are a long way from total replacement of soya,” she added.
▶ POULTRY WORLD | No. 4, 2021 23
Professor Emily Burton of Not- tingham Trent University touched on a new initiative that involved re- cycling industrial carbon dioxide into cost-com- petitive protein.
PHOTO: NOTTINGHAM TRENT UNIVERSITY
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44