search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
HEAL ▶▶▶TH


Keeping sick children at home In the human world, every parent would know that keeping sick children at home would both ease the recovery and avoid spread of disease to the other children in school. De- spite this basic knowledge about disease prevention and containment, we see in the caretaker’s management of dis- eased pigs, as well as busy parents with sick children, very high risks are taken in order to keep things going. This might explain why 77% of farms are holding pigs back for weaning quality, keep weaned pigs in farrowing room (58%), and al- low some kind of continuous flow after weaning in 48% of farms. On top of that, 74% of herds carry out a risky intro- duction of gilts, without proper quarantine facilities and quarantine time. The key benefit of scoring tools, are not the score in itself. The tool should facilitate behavioural changes that improve pig flow and management, by visualising the risky be- haviours and the transmission patterns of pathogens. The evaluation of management procedures in the app is unique in both the details of evaluation and the feedback format that allows farmers, veterinarians and other advisors to ad- dress and prioritise high risk procedures and the way it vi- sualises the score.


Understanding risky behaviours It is important to mention that the differences between success and failure in risk reduction in biosecurity and man- agement are not determined by the details in a scoring re- port. Improvements are only seen when mistakes and risky behaviours are understood and corrected.


Figure 4 - Percentage of very high risk answers given to question 10, 11, 12 and 5 in ‘internal risk’ category.


Examples, Internal risks


Incoming gilts are in contact with PRRSV infected live animals before entry to the sow herd


No restrictions boots and clothing between areas of production


Free movement of employees between areas of production


01020304050607080


▶ PIG PROGRESS | Volume 34, No. 6, 2018


29


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36