search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Facts & Figures Implication Sales & Operations Planning (S&OP) REASONS FOR IMPLEMENTING S&OP


To improve interdisciplinary communication


To create consensus for stand- ardized ‘one-number plan’


To reduce supply chain costs


To implement strategic business plan


To improve insight for executive management


To reduce risk in supply chain network


To improve customer service To manage demand volatility To improve turnover level


To improve resource utilization


To create competitive advantage


To integrate customers and/or suppliers


0 Graphic: SC M 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 BARRIERS TO IMPLEMENTING S&OP Employee skills/resources


Support from senior managers


Process discipline Organizational ‘silo’ structure


Accuracy and reliability of data


Clear division of roles and responsibilities


Too many other business priorities


KEY ACTIVITIES * * in an S&OP process


Integration of financial planning and budgeting


Creation of balanced supply/ demand plan focused on profit optimization


Management of demand forecasting within S&OP


Management of supply limitations within the S&OP plan


Scenario planning to achieve optimal financial results


Maintaining alignment with the business strategy on a monthly basis


Trying to minimize inventory to free up working capital


Scenario planning to reduce supply chain risks


Active management of the product portfolio


Joint planning with customers/suppliers


Graphic: SC M 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80


■ Yes ■ No ■ Don’t know


Technical and systems capacity


Lack of clear S&OP implementation plan


Obstructive behaviour


Lack of clear business strategy


Lack of time to execute the process


Graphic: SC M 0 10 20 INNOVATIE EN BEDRIJFSCULTUUR


PROCESS INNOVATION IN S&OP *


* perception by professionals/experts


17% 32% 51% 51%


INNOVATION IN S&OP *


* perception by professionals/experts


COMPANY CULTURE *


* does this receive sufficient attention during S&OP implementation?


19% 30% 63% 5% 32% 31 30 40 50 60 70 Graphic: SC M


INTEGRATION OF FINANCIAL PLANNING * * + budgeting, in S&OP process, long-term trend


2010 2011 2012 2014 2015 2017


0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80


SUPPLY CHAIN MOVEMENT, No.29, Q2 2018


Source: Supply Chain Trend 2017/Niels van Hove


Source: Supply Chain Trend 2017/Niels van Hove


Source: Supply Chain Trend 2017/Niels van Hove Source: Supply Chain Trend 2017/Niels van Hove


Source: Supply Chain Trend 2017/Niels van Hove


FROM S&OP TO IBP


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48