FEATURE
It becomes more pronounced as workforce composition changes. Teams are now more diverse in terms of gender, religion, age, body shape and physical requirements than when many PPE systems were originally designed.
In many workplaces, discomfort is not formally escalated but absorbed into day-to-day adaptation. Workers adjust how PPE is worn rather than report it, particularly where replacement options are unclear or difficult to access. This means the issue is often underrepresented in formal safety data despite being widely experienced, a pattern reflected in the findings highlighted by GMB.
DESIGNING PPE THAT ALIGNS WITH REAL USE
Improving PPE effectiveness depends on closing the gap between how equipment is designed, how it is issued and how it is worn. The most effective systems are those that reflect actual working conditions rather than assuming uniformity across users.
This begins with recognising variation at the point of selection. PPE ranges that include greater flexibility in sizing, adjustability and design allow organisations to better match equipment to individuals. When this flexibility is absent, fit issues become more likely to persist throughout the lifecycle of the equipment.
It continues in how PPE is issued and replaced, where workers can access different sizes quickly, trial alternatives and replace unsuitable equipment without delay. This reduces the accumulation of small inefficiencies arising when equipment is tolerated rather than suited.
Those using PPE every day are exposed to its limitations in real time, and their feedback provides essential insight into where design or specification is not meeting operational needs. When this input is systematically captured and listened to, it informs more accurate procurement decisions and reduces repetition of the same issues over time.
Manufacturers are also responding with increased focus on ergonomics, adjustability and modular design. These developments aim to accommodate a wider range of users without compromising protective performance, reflecting a broader shift towards equipment that is shaped by how it is used rather than how it is tested.
The findings from the PPE Fit for All campaign reinforce the need to treat fit as part of core safety design rather than an auxiliary consideration, aligning equipment selection more closely with real-world use.
What emerges is a clearer expectation that PPE must function effectively for the people wearing it every day, not just satisfy technical requirements on paper.
ABUS THIS IS MY COMFORT ZONE
ABUS focuses on equipment that prioritises fit, comfort and stability alongside protection, recognising how PPE only delivers its intended purpose when it is worn correctly and consistently in real working conditions.
Across the personal protective equipment range, ABUS develops designs intended to reduce adjustment in use and support a secure, reliable fit throughout the working day. The emphasis is on equipment that works with the wearer rather than against them, supporting consistency rather than requiring compromise.
In summary, as expectations and workforces continue to shift, PPE is increasingly being judged by how it performs in practice rather than how it performs in certification. Fit sits at the centre of this change, because without it, even compliant equipment loses effectiveness the moment it is worn.
www.abus.com/uk/Commercial-Security/Personal-protective-equipment
www.abus.com
17
WWW.TOMORROWSHS.COM
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24
