Megan Hine, Draeger Marine and Offshore, offers an insight into why wireless gas detection and monitoring in the oil, gas and offshore sectors has become a viable option.

Gas detection and monitoring has long been a key consideration for businesses operating in the UK’s oil, gas and offshore sectors. But despite increasing attention by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE), which made reduction in the risk of offshore hydrocarbons a priority in its 2019/20 Business Plan, and by industry, there has arguably been relatively little innovation in the space. Until now, that is.

Wireless technology may have become ubiquitous in most people’s lives for quite some time, but it’s only relatively recently (the last six or so years) that it has become a viable option for gas detection and monitoring for the oil and gas sector. The reasons for this coming of age are, broadly, split into two key areas.

Firstly, industrial wireless technology has seen significant advances in recent years. Whilst the early adoption of wireless gas detection developed a poor reputation for patchy coverage and unreliable connections, data communications are now guaranteed; a crucial component for effective wireless monitoring systems, and which allows for detection of gas to be communicated reliably and in real-time using an ISA 100 industrial wireless system.

Secondly, innovation in relation to device power consumption. Some of the advances in this area have been step-change reductions (in some cases by orders of magnitude), and this has been critical in offsetting more power-hungry functions which have otherwise advanced device functionality. The result is that battery life has improved considerably, with certain devices on the market guaranteeing up to two full years of battery life, compared to only a few months in the early days.

The cumulative impact of this, and other minor, innovations has been significant, and importantly, comes at a time when many legacy (wired) gas detection installations are now desperately in need of updating.

Two or three decades after the UK’s first wired gas detection devices, both the technology and key drivers for monitoring have evolved. Environmental issues related to methane detection could soon rank


alongside ongoing safety concerns around explosion risk etc, and standards around coverage and numbers of devices have also changed.

Often, it is the inflexibility of hard-wired networks to respond to these sorts of changes, plus the vast costs involved in replacing cabling, that is now prompting operators to explore wireless alternatives. To prove the flexibility of wireless gas detection, it is now possible to rent a compliant fixed gas detection system for short to medium term coverage.

The ability to do away with the miles of cabling, which often has a life span of just 10-15 years, is a major advantage of wireless technology. Although the outlay for a wireless device may initially be higher, when the saving on cabling alone can be three times the cost of the wireless device, it’s not a hard decision.

Flexibility is another key advantage – if for any reason a device is found to have been ineffectually placed, or a new device is required, there is no need for new and potentially disruptive groundwork or cable re-routing.

One of the final – and perhaps most substantial – advantages of wireless technology is the fact that no site downtime is required. Wireless devices are intrinsically safe, so can be installed on live sites, offering a huge additional cost saving.

Challenges do remain; and arguably the key barrier to adoption remains education and changing the poor perceptions around the technology, which still persist.

Despite these challenges however, the significant savings (reports of 60-80% overall savings are not uncommon) are contributing to an accelerating pace of adoption. The largest wireless gas detection network ever seen in the North Sea is currently being completed, which will employ 120 wireless devices across a remote seven square mile site. There is little doubt that this sort of project will become more commonplace as greater awareness develops and the full potential of the technology is realised.

Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52