search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
EMERGENCY EVACUATIONS


Expectations are shifting. When wheelchair user Lucas Vezza-O’Brien was unable to evacuate during a school fire and told to wait in a refuge area, it sparked the #NoStudentLeftBehind campaign and parliamentary debate on school preparedness. Too often, evacuation plans prioritise the majority over a diverse population.


FROM REACTIVE RESPONSE TO ANTICIPATORY RESPONSIBILITY


Responsibility is increasingly focused on planning and anticipation rather than response, but effective anticipation requires understanding who may be at risk during an evacuation and what support they need.


In 2024, around 16.8 million people in the UK were living with a disability, nearly a quarter of the population, including more than 5.5 million in employment. With around 80% of disabilities invisible and more people working beyond retirement age, organisations must plan for a more diverse workforce.


These figures challenge assumptions about who may need assistance in an emergency. Mobility impairment extends beyond permanent wheelchair users to include people recovering from surgery, late-stage pregnancy, fluctuating conditions, or cognitive and mental health challenges.


As workplaces, residential and public spaces become more inclusive, emergency planning must reflect the same consideration.


ACCESSIBILITY IS ONLY HALF THE STORY


Access to buildings has improved, with ramps, lifts and accessible facilities now widely expected. Yet far less attention has been given to whether everyone can evacuate safely. In most multi-storey buildings, staircases remain the main escape route, leaving those with mobility impairments reliant on assistance when lifts cannot be used.


The Grenfell Inquiry highlighted the risks of relying on a single evacuation strategy. The ‘stay put’ approach works only when fire safety systems perform as intended; when they fail, evacuation becomes urgent and complex, especially for those unable to leave independently.


EMBEDDING INCLUSIVE PREPAREDNESS


Legislation sets the framework, but preparedness depends on implementation. Effective evacuation planning requires aligned equipment, training and maintenance.


Evacuation equipment should suit the building layout and occupants’ mobility needs. In public and multi- storey premises, this often requires adaptable solutions for different evacuation scenarios.


Manufacturers specialising in evacuation solutions are increasingly designing equipment to support a wider range of mobility needs, supported by training and servicing to ensure readiness. With more than 40 years of experience, Evac+Chair manufactures its evacuation chairs in the UK and emphasises that inclusive evacuation is about more than simply installing equipment.


However, equipment alone cannot guarantee safety. In high-pressure situations, staff must be trained and confident in the safe deployment and operation of Evac+Chairs, while supporting individuals who may already be vulnerable or distressed.


38


Maintenance is critical. As Class I medical devices, Evac+Chairs require annual inspection and servicing under PUWER. Failure to maintain equipment introduces avoidable risk and potential compliance failures. Effective evacuation relies on three elements: suitable equipment, trained personnel and regular servicing.


LEARNING BEFORE THE NEXT CRISIS


Each major disaster that has driven reform was preceded by identifiable vulnerabilities. The introduction of Martyn’s Law and RPEEPs marks important progress, but legislation alone cannot eliminate risk.


Responsible persons must anticipate threats, assess individual needs and ensure evacuation procedures are practical, tested and inclusive.


Inclusive evacuation is no longer a niche issue; it is central to responsible risk management and modern building safety governance.


Preparedness is measured by outcomes, not documentation. When an emergency occurs, systems must function, equipment must perform and people must act with confidence. When the alarm sounds, no one should be left behind.


www.evacchair.co.uk WWW.TOMORROWSHS.COM


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54