FIRE & ELECTRICAL SAFETY BUILDING YOURCASE
The enactment of the Building Safety Act 2022 marked a significant change in the approach to building safety, particularly for high-rise buildings. Under this legislation, in scope-buildings – those with two or more residential units, over 18m or seven stories in height – are subject to stringent requirements, including the preparation of Building Safety Case Reports (BSCRs).
BSCRs summarise the safety case for a high-rise building, identify the building’s safety risks (such as the spread of fire or structural failure), and explain how those risks are being managed.
As the April 2024 deadline looms for BSCR submission, various challenges have emerged in navigating this new regulatory landscape.
One of these challenges is identifying a Principle Accountable Person (PAP) and an Accountable Person (AP). In buildings with complex tenure arrangements, such as those with multiple stakeholders or management structures, deciding on these designations can be challenging. Furthermore, despite the attempts of many building owners to pass these responsibilities on to their managing agents, the Act mandates that the duties of PAP and AP cannot be delegated, adding a further layer of complexity to the process.
Another challenge is legal timeframes. It’s becoming evident that many in-scope buildings will struggle to meet the April deadline for BSCR submission. A backlog of BSCRs has emerged, due to a lack of competent fire safety professionals that can complete the work, and uncertainty surrounding the level of detail expected by the Building Safety Regulator (BSR). Despite these challenges, delaying BSCR preparation is not advisable, as the BSR may initiate the process of requesting Building Assessment Certificates as early as the start of April, which would require a BSCR to be submitted.
Ensuring sufficient detail is another hurdle regarding BSCRs. Balancing the need for a comprehensive report with the requirement to avoid unnecessary complexity poses a significant challenge. While most fire safety professionals adhere to government guidance, reports vary widely in length and content. Striking the right balance between technical detail and clarity is essential to meet BSR requirements and avoid delays in the approval process.
Another challenge may be accessing required information. PAPs will have to gather the right information for BSCR preparation, including historical data, reports, and surveys. In cases where key information is missing, fire safety professionals must exercise judgement to determine if alternative data
22
For businesses, the Building Safety Act 2022 mandates timely preparation of Building Safety Case Reports (BSCR) by April 2024. Navigating this requires overcoming legal complexities and tight deadlines. However, within these challenges lie opportunities for innovation, says Phil Jones, Managing Director of William Martin.
sources are sufficient or if additional surveys are necessary, which has the potential to prolong the process.
Ensuring competence of the fire safety professionals tasked with preparing BSCRs is paramount. Government guidance stipulates that BSCRs must justify the competency of the individual responsible for their preparation. Professional judgment plays a crucial role in this process, as it ensures that BSCRs accurately assess safety risks and mitigation measures.
Additionally, implementing Building Safety Act IT solutions is another key element to BSCR preparation, which can generate problems if done insufficiently. Managing the vast amount of information required for these reports requires robust digital solutions. The government advocates for the adoption of digital platforms, such as William Martin’s Meridian Fire Module, to facilitate data management and reporting. However, selecting a suitable platform involves considerations such as reporting actions, data storage capabilities, and resident engagement management.
To further bolster compliance and streamline BSCR preparation, collaboration among stakeholders is crucial. Building owners, managing agents, and fire safety professionals must work together to facilitate data sharing, address gaps in information and prioritise safety measures. Regular communication can help mitigate all of the challenges I’ve outlined.
“ENSURING COMPETENCE OF THE FIRE SAFETY PROFESSIONALS TASKED WITH PREPARING BSCRS IS PARAMOUNT.”
The difficulties presented by preparing BSCRs are compounded by uncertainties surrounding legal timeframes and regulatory enforcement. To navigate these challenges effectively, my advice would be to engage competent service providers to help with BSCR preparation, develop a phased rollout plan based on risk priorities, and adopt a suitable digital platform to manage and maintain building safety information effectively.
By addressing these challenges proactively, you can ensure compliance with regulatory requirements while enhancing your building safety standards.
https://wmcompliance.co.uk www.tomorrowshs.com
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56
