search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
MATERIALS


Created using a holistic approach for


relative sustainability and relative cost evaluation on the product level


needs across all process phases, from extraction of natural resources to their transformation, logistics, manufacturing of products, energy consumption during the use phase, and recycling at the end of life, is imperative. Political interests, lobbying or ideological ideas must be consistently pushed back. Furthermore, the cost analysis


of all phases must be considered too. When applying this method, and when comparing competitive technologies for the realisation of different products, decision makers, stakeholders and politicians will have transparent and clear grounds – i.e., precisely knowing the impact on cost


and also on sustainability, climate change and the earth’s protection – from which to make the decision whether or not to invest in a product. It is about making sustainability measurable, assessable, qualifiable and quantifiable. This is vital for avoiding


greenwashing, as most decisions are motivated today by the ideological thinking of politicians or large OEMs defending their position, which is often driven by purely economic aspects.


A REAL WORLD EXAMPLE As a case study, we examine here a sustainability value analysis for a


lightweight seat wound by the Gradel Robotic Additive Manufacturing (GRAM) system. It concerns the winding of complex 3D structures by a 7-axis robot. The materials used are basalt fibres and bio-based resin, with a back panel of flax and Alcantara upholstery. The basalt structure has a weight of 1,800 grams. With the described method and


holistic approach, the basalt structure, as well as the Rayon fibres, proved the best result. Compared with steel and plastic injection moulding they cannot compete on price, but they do save energy in the use phase. Carbon and aluminium structures induce the same production cost as basalt or Rayon. Both carbon and aluminium semi-finished products have a huge C02


footprint as they consume a huge


amount of energy, which cannot be recovered during the use phase. Finally, it is obviously important


to analyse the market you are in. For aeronautic passenger seats, for example, the use phase has a much higher importance and therefore carbon has improved chances, as it still offers the best weight/stiffness ratio and mechanical properties. ●


The whole lifecycle of a product must be examined to make the best choice


The author is CEO of Gradel Sàrl. See www.gradel.lu or www.gradellw.eu for more information


www.engineerlive.com 31


Source: AMC GmbH


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44