TEST & SAFETY SYSTEMS


warning and forward collision warning became increasingly common. This is because the development and testing of these systems required accurate position of both the vehicle under test (VUT) and the target to be known extremely precisely. In so-called open sky conditions on


a test track or proving ground, GNSS (global navigation satellite systems, the umbrella term for systems such as GPS, GLONASS etc) is able to provide all of the position data that the development, test and validation of these systems require. However, the increasing requirements to verify the robustness of ADAS systems necessitates testing in different lighting and weather conditions, as well as on the open road, in tunnels and under cover etc. When testing on the open road, dense


tree cover or urban canyons caused by tall buildings can reduce satellite coverage. Worse, reflected satellite signals can trick a GNSS receiver into calculating an incorrect position that may be hundreds of metres out from reality. These issues can be mitigated by tight coupling of an inertial measurement unit (IMU) to GNSS data. This allows poor satellite data to be filtered out, while even data from single satellites can be used to reduce IMU drift and speed-up RTK reacquisition after brief outages. However, even tight coupling still


ultimately relies on the availability of satellite coverage, making it clear that any system able to truly navigate anywhere needs to integrate with other position-aiding sources in addition to GNSS. As an example, park assist has gone


from a niche and expensive optional feature to a commonplace system available on many mainstream cars. However, it must be possible to test these systems in the environment in which they will be used – and given the ubiquity of covered and underground car parks, this necessarily means testing in conditions with very poor or even zero satellite coverage. As automated valet parking systems develop whereby vehicles will drive themselves a short distance to/from a parking space, the need to verify safety is paramount. This necessarily requires knowing the precise location of the VUT, as well as any VRU or vehicle objects used in the test scenario,


ADAS testing is advancing at a rapid rate, accelerated by improvements in sensors


without access to GNSS satellites. OEMs and test houses that have


dedicated facilities for testing these systems can now use ultra-wide band (UWB) technology to calculate position to within a few centimetres with no satellites when used in conjunction with an inertial navigation system (INS). This offers a very cost-effective method of calculating position without the need for visible infrastructure that could bias the testing. As far as the vehicle sensors are concerned, a facility with a UWB system installed would look no different to any other car park or facility. Testing indoors with UWB opens


up many other options, allowing other ADAS systems to now be tested in indoor environments with controlled light, temperature and weather, etc. UWB scales very well and can be used for both small, low-speed applications and much larger, higher-speed environments. However, even here, the requirement


to have permanently installed infrastructure is a limitation that means users are not truly navigating


‘anywhere’. The ultimate goal of a system that can navigate anywhere is to do so without any external infrastructure. One way to achieve this is to


use LIDAR. This is a very powerful surveying tool and can quickly build up a very precise point cloud that can be used to generate centimetre- accurate maps of structures, objects, vehicles and lane lines, etc. This ability can also be used in a technique called SLAM (simultaneous localisation and mapping). Here, the point cloud currently being generated by LIDAR is simultaneously used to localise against the surroundings being mapped. All this means that with a LIDAR


system linked to an INS, an accurate position can be maintained without the need for satellites or other external infrastructure. Such a system could truly be said to be able to navigate ‘anywhere’.●


The author is a product engineer at OxTS. See www.oxts.com for more information


www.engineerlive.com 23


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44