search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
TESTING


Artist’s impression of the finished article


different angles of attack.” By avoiding the use of miles of cable and motors by creating a system that automatically responds to changes in its aerodynamic loading conditions by shifting its shape, lightness is retained. Cramer continues, “We’re able to produce the exact same behaviour you would do actively, but we did it passively.”


MAKING IT The painstaking process of assembly began with cutting the parts out with a waterjet, although this idea has been ditched for the next phase of the project. At several minutes per part, it was just too slow. The next iteration will see the use of an injection-moulded polyethylene resin that the team reckon


will take just 17 seconds to create each piece. Likewise for any series production, rather than relying on the goodwill of the students who hand built this, some form of robot would be constructed to automate the process. The artist’s illustration on the previous page depicts a fleet of them. The resulting lattice arrangement has a density of around of 5.6 kilograms per cubic meter, as compared for example to rubber at about 1,500 kilograms per cubic metre. The stiffness is around the same. The project follows on from a 2013


research project by team member Kenneth Cheung, where he produced a cruder model around one fifth the size. He says, “You can make any geometry


The complexity of manual construction


you want. The fact that most aircraft are the same shape is because of expense. It’s not always the most efficient shape. But massive investments in design, tooling and production processes make it easier to stay with long-established configurations.”


Speaking of size, the new wing is the


size it is because that’s the largest they can accommodate at NASA’s high-speed wind tunnel at Langley Research Centre, where the initial testing took place. The team hope further tests will confirm this flexible approach works, and that the design can then lend itself to other structures, such as wind turbines, bridges or even more ambitious constructions in space. n


Any larger and it wouldn’t fit in the wind tunnel 16 www.engineerlive.com


The work was supported by NASA ARMD Convergent Aeronautics Solutions Program (MADCAT Project), and the MIT Center for Bits and Atoms.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44