OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE
RETHINKING GAS QUALITY F
Hydrocarbon dewpoint: the gap between theory and reality. By Paul Stockwell
or decades, hydrocarbon dewpoint has served as the industry’s standard for determining gas “dryness”
in natural gas transmission and distribution. However, recent fi ndings are suggesting that relying solely on hydrocarbon dewpoint is not enough to ensure dry gas. Widely variable results across dewpoint measurement methods highlight a signifi cant accuracy gap that leads to undetected liquids in pipelines. This variability introduces risks to operations, making a case for advanced tools to provide a more comprehensive approach to gas quality. Traditional hydrocarbon dewpoint
is a key factor in gas sales contracts, determining if natural gas supplies meet the “dry gas” criteria essential for safe transmission. Even small volumes of liquids – mist or stratifi ed fl ows of hydrocarbons – can cause operational challenges downstream. When these go undetected, they can lead to equipment damage, costly disruptions and ineff icient operations. Unfortunately, variations in dewpoint calculation methods can create uncertainty about the true condition of gas in the pipeline, with temperature results for a single gas mixture sometimes spanning up to 186°F (103.6°C)[1]
. This inconsistency
is a growing concern for gas suppliers and end-users alike. To bridge this reliability gap, the
industry must now look at advanced visual monitoring technologies. LineVu, a pioneering pipeline camera system, off ers real-time visualisation of gas fl ows inside high-pressure pipelines, allowing operators to detect actual liquid presence directly. Unlike hydrocarbon dewpoint measurements, which provides only inferred data about liquid formation based on pressure and temperature calculations, LineVu delivers a live view inside the pipeline. This live video feed enables operators to spot liquid mist, stratifi ed fl ows, and small volumes of natural gas liquids (NGLs) that traditional
20
www.engineerlive.com
The variety of fl ow regimes observed
LineVu mounted on a gas pipeline
measurements fail to report. The fi nancial implications of
undetected liquids are signifi cant. Operators may unknowingly pass substantial liquid volumes through custody transfer points, resulting in high maintenance costs and reduced equipment lifespan. For example, an unobserved liquid presence at just 0.1% of the gas volume in a 100MMSCF/D pipeline could result in over 10,000 gallons of lost NGLs daily, translating into millions in annual revenue losses. Liquid carryover in “dry” gas
pipelines can lead to severe operational impacts in gas turbine power stations. The presence of compressor oils, or glycol can block fuel nozzles, causing imbalances and downtime.
IDEAL COMBINATION In many cases, combining hydrocarbon dewpoint with LineVu’s real-time video data is proving invaluable. LineVu cameras, installed at standard tapping points along pipelines, enable operators to gain precise insights into the actual gas conditions. This level of transparency supports operational decisions,
ensuring that pipelines truly meet quality standards and reducing risks of liquid-related failures. Additionally, with real-time monitoring, any deviations in expected gas quality can be addressed immediately, protecting downstream applications from contamination and unplanned downtime. As the gas industry faces increasing
demands for accuracy and operational reliability, visual monitoring is becoming a critical tool for modern gas quality management. Technologies like LineVu are validating other gas analysis and fl ow measurements, providing a comprehensive view that safeguards both operators and end- users from the higher costs and risks of unobserved liquid carryover.
Paul Stockwell is Managing Director of Process Vision.
www.processvision.com
References [1] Embry, D.L., May, E.F., (2024, September 17-20), Increase LNG Profi tability by Early Identifi cation and Mitigation of Solids Formation from North American Pipeline Gas [Paper and presentation], Gastech 2024, TX, USA.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56
