62
DOORS, WINDOWS & CONSERVATORIES SUPPLEMENT
Aluminium or PVCu – which is best for your Local Authority project?
of choice for local authority building projects, specialising in social housing, education and the new build sector. With extensive experience in delivering window projects on time and in budget, Shelforce’s Business Manager Howard Trotter tackles one of the age-old debates when it comes to windows – which are better for your local authority project, aluminium or PVCu windows? When a debate is as longstanding as which material is better when it comes to windows, aluminium or PVCu, it’s usually a sign that it’s almost impossible to answer. Historically, aluminium was the material of
L
choice for windows in the 60s and 70s, but due to poor thermal efficiency and quality, PVCu took over the mantle and has proved the most popular choice for window frames since the 80s thanks to its affordability. Aluminium windows, however, have
come a long way over the past decade in terms of affordability, durability, and thermal efficiency. While aluminium is a firm favourite
with architects and commercial entities, housing associations tend to lean more towards PVCu. But what it really comes down to is budget and the kind of project being undertaken.
Strong, stylish and sleek The surge in popularity of aluminium windows can be traced to the stylish look they offer, with sleeker frames and slimmer sightlines creating a clean and modern look. Slimmer window frames allow for a bigger
pane of glass meaning a better view and more natural light coming in. Aluminium is fantastic for curtain walling,
shop fronts and commercial entrances due to its durability and strength, while it’s also the best product for achieving stringent wind load calculations. Thanks to advances in technology, aluminium windows are now among the best-insulated on the market due to an innovative polyamide thermal break within the frame which prevents too much heat from being conducted. And because aluminium is a highly durable metal that doesn’t rust, the frames are
practically maintenance-free and can last up to 45 years
Significant advances – and still good value The popularity of PVCu windows is down to their affordability thanks to material costs and being much quicker to manufacture. But there have also been significant advances in the PVCu market with respect to design and PVCu systems have been introduced that replicate both aluminium colours and sight lines, as well as more traditional finishes, such as flush sashes for traditional timber alternatives. Thanks to the new PVCu designs
and colour options, more cost-effective solutions to aluminium are available which now provide the aesthetics called for by architects. PVCu is also resistant to rot which means
they require little maintenance and provides good insulation ability, while a PVCu window has a lifespan of 35 years and as a hugely sustainable material it can be recycled 10 times, meaning PVCu can offer up to 350 years of service.
Multi-chambered PVCu frame profiles can
also help reduce noise and are also warp-free, which means there will be no distortion in the frame which can seriously reduce the effectiveness of the seal.
Application is everything It’s clear that aluminium windows have developed over the past 10 years but there will always be a place for PVCu thanks to its affordability and the significant advances in the PVCu market. But as to which one is better, it comes down to application. For curtain walling or wide span projects, aluminium should be favourite. When it comes to affordable housing, however, PVCu is the material to consider. Founded in 1839, Shelforce has been involved in a whole host of local authority building projects including, most recently, Birmingham Council’s first ever ‘ModPod’ and a revamp of a 20-storey tower block in Aston to help homeless families. For more information please contact Shelforce.
0121 603 5262
www.shelforce.com
eading window and door manufacturer Shelforce is Birmingham City Council’s chosen manufacturer
WWW.ARCHITECTSDATAFILE.CO.UK
ADF MARCH 2020
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100
