search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS


The devil is in the detail: fire protection processes for timber


Howard Morris at Trade Fabrication Systems explores the relative performance benefits of fire-retardant surface coatings and pressure treatments for timber, and explains the merits of an alternative process


construction, but it has a major flaw – it burns. As fire protection drives design, it is integral for architects to utilise products and solutions that meet the needs of the market, while guaranteeing adherence to Building Regulations.


A


The Euro Class system determines a product’s fire performance by measuring it against a comprehensive set of characteristics. As wood is an organic combustible material, it will never achieve Euro Class A1 or A2 non-combustibility. With this in mind, the highest fire-retardant classification wood can receive is Euro Class B which can be successfully achieved by embracing timber technologies and enhancing the substrate. There are two main types of fire-retardant timber treatment that can be used to achieve compliance; pressurised treatment and surface coating.


Scratching the surface of FR coatings


One of the most common forms of fire protection for timber substrates is the application of fire retardant coatings. Cost effective and compliant, the coating can be applied to any wood-based product through a traditional onsite coating process. Protecting the appearance of the substrate, while also guaranteeing its structural integrity remains intact, surface coating is an ideal way to ensure timber complies with Euro Class specification. However, true compliance is entirely dependent on the coating applied and the timber substrate originally tested. For example, if the type of timber used differs to the one that was tested, this solution will be non compliant – as the fire retardant coating may not perform as expected in


ADF DECEMBER 2019


practice. The same is also true if the coating is not applied to the exact specification and consistency of that tested. So, while fire retardant coatings represent a cost effective route to delivering fire protection performance, there remains room for error onsite, particularly in relation to the quality control of workmanship.


Under pressure to perform Pressure treatment is an alternative method to Building Regulations compliance. A time consuming process, the timber substrate is impregnated with chemical preservatives to enhance its durability and withstand damage and exposure to the elements. The pressure treatment method should


WWW.ARCHITECTSDATAFILE.CO.UK


dmired for its rustic appearance, strength and cost, timber is an attractive material for use within


57


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84