search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
14 COMMENT


The recent increase in the cost of council borrowing via the Public Works Loan Board has already sent treasurers and directors of finance back to their calculations and spreadsheets, to see how the higher interest charges will impact on their council’s housebuilding plans. Another huge test will be whether MMC can deliver the sort of features and qualities that saw Goldsmith Street win the prestigious Stirling Prize, from the Royal Institute of British Architects. This has been added to the Neave Brown Award for Housing, which recognises the best new example of affordable housing in the UK and was won earlier in the year.


POPULAR WITH RESIDENTS


Goldsmith Street consists of almost 100 energy-efficient homes, laid out in rows of two-storey houses, bookended by three-storey flats, each with their own front door, space for prams and bikes, and a private balcony. Each home meets the Passivhaus Standard, meaning energy costs are estimated to be 70 per cent cheaper than the average household. When the television news crews were being shown around by the very proud (and lucky) tenants, the energy efficiency aspect of the homes got a particularly favourable commendation. One tenant said they had only used their heating twice since they moved in.


The new houses were obviously not cheap to build, but they are producing a really useful asset with a long life and providing comfort and stability to the residents, as well as reducing their use of greenhouse gases. Compare this to the unstable and unhealthy living conditions of temporary accommodation being endured by many thousands. The latest Government figures show


that councils in England spent £93.3m on bed & breakfast accommodation in 2017/18. This is expected to have risen to well over £125m during 2018/19, as nightly charges and the numbers being accommodated in B&Bs have both risen. This money is effectively being thrown


away. It produces nothing for the councils or for the families who are being ‘warehoused’ until something better comes along for them. At an estimated cost of £150,000 per new council home, the money paid to the B&B owners could have provided permanent, low-rent homes for 800 families.


HELP AND SUPPORT NEEDED In many respects this is precisely the sort of calculation that needs to be done, but only as part of a much more complicated set of questions and answers, which factors in a whole basket of issues including peoples’ health and life chances, as well as the security of having


WWW.HBDONLINE.CO.UK


a settled home. I have spoken with many councillors


and council officers in recent months. They all see the existence and establish- ment of stable and successful communities as hugely important outcomes. They also feel that their efforts are not being supported sufficiently by the Government. The long-running Brexit saga and the change of Prime Minister has distracted Whitehall to a huge degree for the last couple of years. We are also nearly 30 months on from the Grenfell Tower disas- ter, and might just be starting to see some movement on changes being made to Building Regulations and fire safety. In the Queen’s Speech the Government announced its intention to implement a new set of building safety standards, consistent with the Hackitt Review and focused on delivering a new safety framework for high-rise residential buildings. However, more column inches were grabbed by Communities Secretary Robert Jenrick’s plans to introduce a new shared ownership Right to Buy, which will allow HA tenants to buy as little as a 10 per cent stake initially, with staircasing allowed in increments of just one per cent. People working in the social housing sector see this as a huge distraction and would rather the Minister was instead focused on helping councils to design and deliver thousands of new council homes.


A BROKEN MODEL The true extent of the problem in delivering new social housing was laid bare when L&Q publicly declared that the current development model of providing cross subsidies from outright


sales was broken, and failing to deliver new rented homes in the numbers needed. If an association with the size and


ambition of L&Q is having difficulty delivering new homes at affordable rents, then you can bet the rest of the HA sector is as well. But it is not just problems with


declining grant rates and difficulties in shifting recently completed properties in a market full of nervous would-be buyers, that is making social landlords seriously re-think their spending plans. Many social landlords are facing the


prospect of having to spend huge sums on ensuring their housing stock is properly safeguarded from the risk of fire. Balancing the two is hugely problematic. The G15 group of develop- ing HAs in the capital recently estimated they are having to earmark £6.87bn for fire safety works to their high-rise blocks. This eye-watering sum is reducing the


amount they can spend on building new affordable homes. And this is where the contribution of local councils will be so important in picking up the slack and replacing HAs as the main providers of new social homes for rent. But the Local Government Association has warned that the one per cent increase in PWLB borrowing rates could see council housebuilding projects cancelled, postponed or pared back in size. One person who hopes that will not


happen at his council is Michael Jones, the head of housing at York City Council. He visited Goldsmith Street in Norwich back in July and he plans to build three similar estates in York to the same Passivhaus energy-efficient standards. He said: “The site visit gave us the confidence to do it. I remember getting goosebumps walking around.”


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60