DEADLINE extended for second homes “I’m very happy for those

been caught in the transition. We’ve listened and have given people a bit more time to get their permits in place.” The move follows

widespread criticism of new regulations introduced in February following passage of Bill 52, which removed a provision allowing for a second home on farm properties for family members. The change was part of steps to rein in residential development on farmland and curb speculation. However, the move took

many municipalities and landowners by surprise. The pressure peaked

following a June 17 meeting District A Farmers Institute hosted in Nanoose Bay on Vancouver Island. Concerns voiced there received widespread media coverage, followed by earnest pledges from the government that grandfathering provisions were coming. Those followed July 4, and marked a small victory for critics. District A Farmers Institute

president Janet Thony gave the announcement a mixed review, however.




We service all of Southern BC







604.209.5523 TROY


Retirement Planning Tip

We generate tax efficient off-farm income to ease the income crunch when farms transition.

folks who can carry on with their plans. Hopefully it is a reasonable time frame,” she said. “I am not happy that a ‘grandfathering period’ indicates they will not reverse the decision to not allow a second residence for ‘immediate family.’” Thony says the prohibition

on allowing immediate family to live on a property constituted “a direct attack on the principle of the ‘family farm.’” However, Popham has steadfastly maintained that secondary residences are still allowed if they support farm operations. All landowners need to do is apply to the Agricultural Land Commission. Additional discussions in 2020 will support regulations that accommodate families that farm.

A wholesale modernization

of regulation is needed, said Popham, not the piecemeal approach that’s been taken in the past. “When the old government made changes to the ALR, they took a piecemeal approach that hurt our

CORRECTION: The treaty map accompanying “Treaties create uncertainty for range users” in the July edition was mislabelled. The red outline shows what the Northern Secwepemc te Qelmucw are claiming as their traditional territory; the pink identifies the traditional territory of the whole Shuswap nation. We apologize for the error.

COUNTRY LIFE IN BC • AUGUST 2019 nfrom page 1

producers,” said Popham. “We’ve been working on regulations. As part of that, we’re looking at how we can provide farmers with more flexibility in their businesses, while continuing to preserve the valuable farmland they rely on.” In the meantime, housing suppliers welcome additional time for landowners to seek approvals. Two clients of Triple R

Modular Homes in Merville put their modular home orders on hold as a result of the rule change, says owner Larry Huston. Since the grandfathering period was announced, they’ve told him they’ll proceed. He expects more to follow. “It’s already turned positive

for us,” he said. “[There’s] nothing new as of yet, but we’re looking at trying to figure out how we can do something on our website to promote that you’ve got a year.”

While most people

typically want homes delivered before the autumn rains begin, the February deadline gives them time to seek approvals for homes delivered in 2020. The number of property

owners likely to take advantage of the reprieve is difficult to estimate. There have been 28 applications to the Agricultural Land Commission for residential use of farmland between February 22 (when the new regulations were introduced) and June 17. Of these, three applications – all

in the South Coast region – were for homes larger than 500 square metres, the maximum allowed under Bill 52. The rest were for secondary residences, with 12 applications on the South Coast and 10 in the Okanagan. Since landowners didn’t

have to seek the land commission’s approval for

secondary homes for immediate family prior to February, there’s no indication yet of whether landowners are rushing to locate a modular home on their property for family before they’re not allowed. “This is new legislation so

we don’t really have any comparison,” says commission CEO Kim Grout.

A bit of history This year’s fight over

residential development within the Agricultural Land Reserve hearkens back to the outcry when a previous NDP government slapped a freeze on the subdivision of farmland in December 1972. That move came as

landowners and brokers rushed to subdivide parcels before the government of NDP Premier Dave Barrett made good on its promise “to set aside areas for agricultural production so as to prevent such land being subdivided for industrial and residential use.”

The only exceptions

were parcels less than two acres in size and any land in non-farm use on June 21, 1972. When the reserve was created the following spring, it totalled less than 11.7 million acres, a fraction of the more than 74 million acres of farmland in BC. A torrent of protest dogged its creation, with the BC Federation of Agriculture saying access to farmland was a key issue for growers but their

property rights must be unfettered. Many growers wanted compensation for devaluation of properties they banked on selling after years of hard work. (By contrast, the federation’s successor, the BC Agriculture Council, has generally endorsed the recent changes.) Yet erosion of the

reserve has been steady. More than 7,150 acres has been lost since the current NDP government took power in 2017, and it now totals 11.4 million acres. Moreover, approximately 44,450 parcels are less than two acres – meaning they would never have been part of the original freeze in 1972. And less than half the reserve is actively farmed, a situation that has persisted for much of its existence.

The number of farmers has also declined, with the latest census of agriculture in 2016 counting 17,528 farms employing 44,556 people. This compares to 130,000 people working the land in 1972. —Peter Mitham



NH TS115A 4X4,CAB, SYNCHRO-COM TRANS, SHUTTLE, 115HP, 8000 HRS, LOADER MOUNT.............................................................. 28,900 FORD 8210 4X4, CAB, LOADER, DUAL POWER TRANS, 4000 HRS....22,000 MASSEY FERGUSON 265 2WD, CAB, 60 PTO HP, INDUSTRIAL LOADER, SPIKE MOUNT, FRONT HYD REMOTE, 2,200 HRS, ONE OWNER.......... 9,500 GMC CAB OVER 5 TON DIESEL TRUCK WITH 18 FT TYCROP SILAGE BOX, GOOD CONDITION ............................. 14,000 KVERNELAND 7517 WRAPPER, CABLE OPERATED, GD COND. ....... 8,500

BOBCAT S510 SKIDSTEER, OPEN CAB, 2530 HRS, SINGLE SPEED DRIVE ....................................................................... 28,000 HYLINE 6600 BALE PRO GRINDER-FEEDER. GD CONDITION .......... 7,500 JD 336 & MASSEY 228 SQUARE BALERS. GD COND ............7,500/5,500 ARTEX 2512 HE SAWDUST THROWER, SKID STEER ATTACH, NEW CONDITION ................................................................................6,500 LOEWEN 9612 VERTICAL MIXER . GOOD CONDITION ................... 18,000 CASE CHIESEL PLOW 9 FT WIDE, HD SPRING SHANK .................. 2,500 LOEWEN MANURE AGITATOR 18 FT, RECENT REBUILD ................ 2,200

Tractor/Equipment Repair Mobile Service Available We accept Interact, Visa and Mastercard ABBOTSFORD, BC

Bus. 604/807-2391 Fax. 604/854-6708 email: GD Repair Ltd

Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40