search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
36


A hob needs watching carefully, and should never be left unattended when switched on – but with students’ habit of late-night cooking, this is easier said than done!


matters worse. A fast jet of water aimed into a pan fire is likely to spread the fat and the flames very quickly onto surrounding surfaces, or even people.


A hob needs watching carefully, especially when preparing anything with fats and should never be left unattended when switched on – but with students’ habit of late-night cooking, this is easier said than done!


Full blown fires in student accommodation are quite rare – the more usual event is smoke from a toaster or perhaps food burning while cooking. In many circumstances this would only cause, at worst, a small localised fire that could be dealt with by the student opening windows and wafting a tea towel around. However, it’s inevitable that some kitchen doors will be left open while cooking. While kitchen doors will most certainly have automatic door closers and intumescent strips edging the door, students could wedge the door open to be sociable and for their convenience. Doing this allows the smoke generated to escape into common areas such as corridors where the smoke detectors are sited. This can at best be an annoyance to other students in the block and at worst, trigger the main smoke alarm, potentially causing evacuation. If a fire alarm has been triggered, automatically calling the fire brigade, there will also be further cost implications such as call out charges. Whether the cost should fall on the university, the students or the public purse is an ongoing debate.


WWW.ARCHITECTSDATAFILE.CO.UK


However, the risk of fires occurring and students being injured far outweighs the potential inconvenience of false alarms. It is not just the safety of the students at stake but also the cost of refurbishment, loss of valuable books, computers and lecture notes. Technology can come to the rescue here. Rather than relying on the student to switch the hob off or repeated checks ensuring that kitchen doors aren’t wedged open, there are devices that can do the job automatically. For example, count down timers can switch the hob off after a predetermined period of time, and kitchen door alarms can be installed that once triggered will only silence by closing the door. Although practical, these technologically advance solutions are available, they are not immune to the efforts of students seeking to tamper with them. The universities take a dim view of students who tamper with this type of equipment. It is important that measures such as protective cages and anti-tamper fixings are used to prevent students from seeking to compromise the alarm, either deliberately, or perhaps in ignorance of its potential lifesaving function. Technically speaking, these are preventable alarms rather than false alarms, but are still part of the debate. Fire alarms are for the many not the few,


and it’s important to take measures to prevent a fire starting in the first place.


David Hoyle is managing director of Hoyles Electronic Developments


ADF APRIL 2019


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44