search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
400 YEARS OF FIREPLACES


carved for reasons of economy. Some entire chimneypieces were even manufactured from papier-mâché. By the 1790s reeded surrounds with corner roundels (or paterae) became a common pattern which prevailed for several decades.


The early 1800s were a period of architectural eclecticism, so chimneypieces in important houses reflected contemporary interests in Greek, Egyptian, Gothic as well as Jacobean styles. In all cases the hearth would invariably be made of local stone.


VICTORIAN Count Rumford was an American technologist who as early as 1790 applied scientific principles to fireplace efficiency. He recommended placing the fire lower in the opening, narrowing the throat of the flue, reducing the size of the fireplace opening and lining it with a firebrick surround. His aim was to provide better draught control and to reflect more heat back into the room. Despite the benefits, Rumford’s recommendations were slow to catch on in Britain and it took 100 years before they were adopted universally. Existing fireplaces were ‘Rumfordised’ and new fireplaces were built to his recommendations.


The early Victorian chimneypiece still consisted of flat jambs and a lintel supporting a mantelshelf. This pattern was reproduced in timber, plaster or stone and could be enriched with a variety of mouldings according to taste. Cheaper materials such as timber or slate were frequently painted to imitate marble.


The ‘register-grate’ was introduced from about 1850 and combined the throating, the fireback and the firebasket. Its design incorporated dampers to control the supply of combustion air and an adjustable trap door to control of the flow of flue gases. The draught could be reduced once the fire was well established. They were typically manufactured with an arched top in either cast iron or bright steel.


Ironfounders captured the market for fireplaces in the latter half of the 19th century. They produced fireplaces in every conceivable style and size. Companies like Coalbrookdale produced catalogues of cast-iron surrounds that could be cast integrally or separately from their firegrates.


Splay sided fire surrounds with decorative tile inlays replaced the arch-topped variety in the 1870s. The splayed cheeks reflected heat into the room and were used for decorative effect. As designs developed there was a tendency for the fire to project further forward so integral cast-iron hoods became commonplace during the 1880s.


Continued >> 76 Listed Heritage Magazine September/October 2018


White marble surrounds with corner roundels became extremely popular in the late Georgian and Regency periods. This one incorporates an oven alongside the hobgrate


This 19th-century hobgrate uses a Tudor arch with enriched spandrels in a decorative pink marble surround


The register-grate was used extensively in the second half of the Victorian period. In this example the whole fireplace is manufactured as one casting including the surround and mantel shelf


Decorative ceramic tiles were common in fire surrounds from the 1870s


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152