The 101 on
Fire Door Safety Responsibilities
Statistics show that the industry need to educate tenants on who to speak to regarding fire door safety, while there is a call for more transparency in the chain of responsibility, says Allegion Commercial Leader Pete Hancox.
Fire door safety can often be a minefield. Knowing the many different standards and regulations that affect the use of fire doors, which can often be complex and sometimes contradictory, can be tough. To name a few, there is the ‘Regulatory
Reform Fire Safety Order’ (RRFSO) that details the responsibilities of the so-called ‘responsible person’ for fire risk assessment. There’s also Regulation 38 of the Building Regulations, which links the Building Regulations to RRFSO to ensure that adequate fire safety provisions are incorporated into buildings when constructed. ‘Approved Document B’ of the Building Regulations specifically covers fire safety guidance for buildings in which fire doors play a unique role, and is designed to ensure that fire safety and performance requirements are met. With so many regulations, it is easy to see
why tenants, and even those in the actual supply chain of fire doors, can become confused. In fact, according to Atomik Research’s
survey of 1,000 tenants living in flats in 2016, only 35 per cent of the lowest income
38 fmuk
households renting say they have been given information on the emergency fire plan. At the same time, more than 58 percent of tenants have no idea who the responsible person is in their buildings. And, that’s likely why 15 per cent of tenants who have had fire safety concerns have never reported them to anyone. Exactly who is responsibe for ensuring the
fire doors in a building function correctly to guarantee the safety of our buildings and its occupants? The answer stems all the way from the architects of the building, right through to the owners, building control, fire departments and facilities managers.
Architects and Specifiers
Architects and specifiers aren’t usually directly responsible for the final say on fire door safety; however, they are in control of a building’s design. As such, they have an associated responsibility of making sure a building is designed with fire safety in mind. Architects should be encouraging the
use of third-party accredited fire doors and ironmongery, as well as considering specifying specific doorsets.
Developers and Contractors
For developers and contractors, they arguably have the hardest task within the supply chain of building management. They are often tasked with delivering the visions of architects and specifiers, but also managing these projects on tight budgets for stakeholders. Add to that the fact that they have to
deliver projects that meet various standards and legislation, and you can start to see why this group comes under scrutiny often. To ensure building projects are managed
within budget and are safe and secure, always use third party accredited and certified products from regulated maufacturers. Manufacturers will be able to determine
which solutions are viable from a finance perspective. They will also know the specifics about hardware you are intending to use, and where you can, or cannot, specify them in your buildings. Even if budgets are tight, our advice
is to go for quality products. Quality products may cost more from the outset, but will outlast cheaper alternatives and pay back the costs over longer periods
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44
