search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
TECHNICAL


  


some golf courses, but most golfers - the paying customers - rightly or wrongly, expect a more manicured and maintained appearance. Greenkeeping professionals also have great pride in their golf courses and don’t want to lose control of bunker edges. Typically, ‘half-moon edging’ has been the preferred technique for tidying up bunker edges. However, this again is time consuming and it usually leads to an incremental loss of the original bunker shape (which can negatively affect aesthetics and strategy). It is also very easy to introduce more sand contamination during the process and, as we shall see, where bunker liners are already in place, it is a practice that should be avoided. Bunker liners are becoming widespread as more golf clubs begin to understand the benefits they bring. However, if a bunker liner is installed without attention to the edge detail, this can lead to big problems down the line. We have seen many issues, although one of the worst effects is when ‘half moon edging’ takes the bunker edge outside the line of the buried bunker liner. This will, in almost every instance, permit sand to penetrate underneath. Soon, liners will reach the surface, and a complete reconstruction will be urgently needed. The photograph above shows the


effect of bunker edging over an expensive rubber crumb liner at one of the golf clubs where we were invited to provide advice and assistance. Where bunker liners are used, edge maintenance should be undertaken with more care. Options are limited. Therefore, it is highly advisable to consider future maintenance when selecting the construction detail for bunker edges. Revetting, using thick cut, custom produced natural turf, is very popular. However, this is not a permanent solution and, on average, will have to be completely rebuilt every four or five years (and sometimes more regularly on exposed south facing edges). As it is natural turf, it is of course also vulnerable to drought and we have seen many natural edged bunkers struggling over the past few weeks.


A good alternative to natural turf revetting is artificial turf revetting. The facts that it needs very little maintenance and that it won’t have to be rebuilt for at least a 20-year period are widely understood by now. It is not significantly more


expensive than natural turf and whole life costings typically show a full return on investment (ROI) within five to seven years and, thereafter, major cost benefits for another fifteen years and more.


In the current conditions, tall bunker edges can be vulnerable


    


 +44 (0)2920 397 472


OR


 


Take Control Now That’s intelligent.


www.rainbird.com/iq


See what IQ Cloud can do for you on iqweb.rainbird.com The Ultimate tool for remote water management:


- Multi user - Remote control from PC and Tablet - IQ Mobile on your Smartphone - No fees


For more information please contact plongman@rainbird.eu www.rainbird.eu


PC August/September 2018 133


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156